MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - melastmohican

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 67
201
StockFresh / Re: A year? Really?
« on: June 10, 2011, 13:15 »
Finished processing my first batch. Interface is slight improvement over StockXpert but far from what YAY or CanStockPhoto is offering so I would put them somewhere in the middle on usability scale.

On side note. How they get away with source code and sell company to Getty without signing non-competing agreement? If the site is almost StockXpert clone, with a few improvements if they get stronger Getty will go after them.

they havent sold StockXpert, they have sold the content on it.. and as we know to place on Thinkstock (Hemera collection) so they made two things, eliminate competition and get more content to subs

Actually I forgot, they sold it to Jupiter and Getty acquired them with all assets.  So Jupiter really did not make contract right  :-) Anyway as long as there were no patents on the source code they probably can reuse it :-)

202
StockFresh / Re: A year? Really?
« on: June 10, 2011, 12:28 »
Finished processing my first batch. Interface is slight improvement over StockXpert but far from what YAY or CanStockPhoto is offering so I would put them somewhere in the middle on usability scale.

On side note. How they get away with source code and sell company to Getty without signing non-competing agreement? If the site is almost StockXpert clone, with a few improvements if they get stronger Getty will go after them.

203
123RF / Re: Are images coming from FTP automatically now?
« on: June 10, 2011, 09:18 »
It is not fixed. Images are still going to web server automatically.

204
They actually read this forum and confirmed that there was something wrong with recent changes on their site :-)

205
In IS, Caucasian and European refer to the same thing with the disambiguation.

Yes, this solves the problem. I do not have to include all 3 possible variants.

I guess I will start using thesaurus for getting more synonyms so maybe one day search engine would also start taking them into account.

Main Entry:    cute
Part of Speech:    adjective
Definition:    perky, attractive
Synonyms:    adorable, beautiful, charming, dainty, delightful, pleasant, pretty
Antonyms:    homely, ugly

Aeonf is right.  If you are only uploading to Istock, then you don't need to include the variations.  

I see you have portfolios on multiple websites.  If you are uploading to other sites, which do not have disambiguation, then you need the other keywords.  If you have the keyword "attractive" at Dreamstime, Fotolia, Shutterstock, or anywhere other than Istock, and someone searches for "cute" your image will not show up.  

You seem to not understand how keywording works.  I am just concerned someone who doesn't know better is going to follow your advice and remove useful keywords from their images.  That would be a mistake.   

OK maybe phrasing of the subject is bad. I meant that if I use most popular search terms I cannot find my pictures buried under thousands of others but without them I can find them quickly.  I am not talking about using weird keywords cause I will be only person who will find my picture. I am talking about precise set of relevant keywords which uniquely identify subject.

Most of the sites actually suggest to use minimum number of relevant keywords. General practice is to include all possible synonyms of relevant keywords just in case.  I understand that people keyword for search engines not to correctly describe images. It's not relevant for every picture of a woman to have word "attractive" and every child to have word "cute". Keywording become a social activity. If most people think that these words give the best results they will include them. Basically search for  similar image to yours and collect first 30 most popular words and your are done.  Yes, I read warning on almost every site about keyword spamming audits. Did it ever happen?

206
When it works it is one of the easiest workflows around but there are problems in last few days so process is broken. I am still able to upload but image transfer from ftp to web server which used to be manual now happens automatically. Maybe it's a new feature they are trying to roll out but something went wrong.

207
StockFresh / Re: A year? Really?
« on: June 09, 2011, 18:26 »
I got accepted today after sending them question about how much longer I have to wait.

208
He's my hubby, so he works for free.  :D

If I want my wife to assist me, she wants to take photos and I become an assistant :-)

209
StockFresh / Re: I wish I asked ealier :-(
« on: June 09, 2011, 17:39 »
I got automated process that uploads 10 images per day only during week. Al l I have to do to ad their ftp server to the list. this means they will get only images from my current queue. Anything from the past I will have to manually select and upload so maybe it's not worth the effort.

210
Adobe Stock / Re: fotolia is sinking
« on: June 09, 2011, 17:16 »
I am really tiny, tiny fish there. I observe better acceptance in last couple months and marginally better sales at the beginning of this year and slow down in last two months.

211
StockFresh / I wish I asked ealier :-(
« on: June 09, 2011, 17:14 »
Yesterday I asked how long it going to take and today I got acceptance letter.

What is the best strategy? Obviously I got an urge to  dump everything there but this time I will try to restrain myself from doing this :-) I will include them in my current upload process so it will send 10 images per workday.

212
I guess rejecting is less costly than approving (takes longer for inspector and takes storage space). Unless you offer something which is not widely represented in their database they have no interest in new stuff. It will be buried behind old stuff that sells anyway.

213
In IS, Caucasian and European refer to the same thing with the disambiguation.

Yes, this solves the problem. I do not have to include all 3 possible variants.

I guess I will start using thesaurus for getting more synonyms so maybe one day search engine would also start taking them into account.

Main Entry:    cute
Part of Speech:    adjective
Definition:    perky, attractive
Synonyms:    adorable, beautiful, charming, dainty, delightful, pleasant, pretty
Antonyms:    homely, ugly

214
I think that some keywords are over used and now we have no choice but include them.

The other thing is cultural difference. People in Europe would never search for Caucasian. They will type white or European.

My other observation is often miss use of words "infant" and "toddler". Search for newborn and you got images of walking children and vice-versa.

215
I started replacing "Caucasian" with "European". I live in USA and she was born here but for us Europeans, Caucasian sounds to much Asian, which technically correct but it is how we feel :-) If I would use just word "white" for race it carries some sort of stigma here in USA :-) What a mess :-)

216
That was actually spiderpic so on all major sites.

217
I just figured out search for some photos of my daughter that if I skip these buzz keywords I am instantly finding them. Otherwise they are buried by tons of images on top of them.

218
My last 4 batches (10 randomly selected photos per batch) were 100% rejected.

219
123RF / Are images coming from FTP automatically now?
« on: June 09, 2011, 10:56 »
I have noticed that that recently there are are no images to process but when I edit my images new ones appear there.

220
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Manual removal from PP?
« on: June 01, 2011, 14:49 »
I asked them politely again. If they are not going to respond in two days I probably have to file a complaint with BBB.

221
One page show correct number of clips and images in my portfolio another (in this new widget) constantly changes mind about the count :-) It is not a rocket science :-)

222
StockXpert.com / Re: Thinkstock earnings posted
« on: May 20, 2011, 13:02 »
This time I took screen shot :-)

223
Early vacation season started?

224
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Manual removal from PP?
« on: May 15, 2011, 17:49 »
It seems like they do not respond to emails. I am trying to be reasonable and wait few days then if there is not response I file a complaint.

225
StockFresh / Re: Any News?
« on: May 13, 2011, 16:47 »
Nothing here. By the time I got approved they will start rejecting like other sites :-)

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 67

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors