MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Morphart
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20
201
« on: September 17, 2012, 19:01 »
Seriously funny. I guess it's the famous 'satire defence' - but it does have ads on the pages ...
He could have bought the images at least  Still funny though
202
« on: September 17, 2012, 08:33 »
It's a great idea but I doubt that this forum is open-minded enough, I'm sure you would have more luck with all these young photographers on Facebook. I will probably give it a try with some of my pictures.
I think this forum is very open minded. With declining revenues from microstock, I am sure that a lot of photographers are exploring new ways to generate revenue with their images. I look forward to many on this forum trying it and giving their honest opinion ( which I sure I will have).
ps : if you don't want to wait for your invite to come, let me know via PM and can get you instant access.
Pm
Hi! The concept is good but I have some questions as there are things I do not understand: 1- People use an embed code to show the image on their website. The image will surely only be used "as is" to add life to a text. Most users will not click those images as there are no incentive to do so. How will an image earn revenue By Click if it cannot be modified to add personalized advertisement on it? If the people that uses your images only pay per click and not per views, I think that it might not get much result? 2- If they are to be used like this maybe a small copyright information embedded on the image can also help to limit the easy steals. Thanks for explaining!
203
« on: September 17, 2012, 08:20 »
I had a $50 for one illustration sale today, surprising. 
I bought it .... are you interested in more work ?
You can contact the user by clicking his name and sending him a PM in case he doesn't your reply in this thread
204
« on: September 16, 2012, 15:09 »
Monthly income it's almost impossible to calculate on a mobile phone that is because the agencies dont provide that info, and you need to access all sales history from each agency and see what images were sold in that month, this is very time consuming on a mobile device that needs to make hundreds of requests to agency website and this is not feasible on a mobile device because it takes too long and the device will lock and close the application with maybe half of data retrieved (in this case the iPhone)
Hi! Not to undermine what you say but your competitor Photosales does give Monthly Income. Just saying, as I would gladly pay 5$ or 10$ more for your app to simply have this Feature. Monthly gain and Monthly gain total. Buy Photosales and check, theirs work and is pretty accurate (cents or a few dollar apart from reality). Keep me inform if you ever add this feature, would be a big +
205
« on: September 16, 2012, 15:05 »
Finally I got one lobotomy follower 
How many empty letters. Can you please hob-nob with you scanner and with make it good trace button in Illustrator...
Congrats for you sales anyhow...
Hehe congrats on reading that reply :p Anyhow everything looks simpler and easier when you look at it from the outside  . You're an artist, I am and investor and wannabe artist, bottom line, we make money, and that is what selling Microstock is about for the most part. Hope it made you feel better, else a therapist might help :p
206
« on: September 15, 2012, 10:00 »
I stumbled into that App while looking for a better Apps than PhotoSales apps. Sure was happy to find more agencies covered by your App.
One suggestion I would like to see on the apps: Monthly income for each agencies.
For some low earners agencies, there is a balance that is kept into the account after a month is done because the payout minimum is not reached, thus it's ''hard'' to know what your real monthly income is without deducting manually the amounts that haven't been withdrawn the previous month.
Do you think such a feature is possible (monthly income no matter what the total is currently in the account)?
207
« on: September 15, 2012, 09:32 »
Thought to be the oldest colour footage in the world. The inventor/photographer died at 29, before he'd worked out how to project it, so it was never seen until now.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19423951
Wow very impressive, thanks for sharing this!
208
« on: September 11, 2012, 17:24 »
Wow refreshing to hear this! They are a 'leader' in Video sales for me and it seems photos are selling even if fairly new, I'll have a shot upload my most popular images too I guess
209
« on: September 11, 2012, 11:52 »
I was pretty excited to read this. Not really sure if there will be a real impact and if the users will install and use this plugin to buy stock video, but definetly sounds a good initiative: If you haven't received the news already, Pond5 and Adobe teamed up to launch a one-of-a-kind plugin that seamlessly integrates our video and audio collection into Premiere Pro CS6. We're thrilled to be showing it off at the IBC Conference this year, and we couldn't do it without our incredible artist community. [...] Add stock media to your cart and transact using your existing account information on the Pond5 website
All info here: http://www.pond5.com/adobe?utm_source=critsend&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_20120910_adobe
210
« on: September 05, 2012, 17:23 »
Around 33% income US, 67% Non-US.
Based in Canada.
211
« on: September 04, 2012, 18:27 »
Hi. I'm looking for an alternative investment and think microstock might be an option. Specifically, I'm thinking about buying the copyrights to microstock that have existing cash flow. Before I spend a great deal of time on this, I thought I might solicit some feedback.
Assuming you would even sell your copyrights, how much would you sell them for? 1 year of existing cash flow, 5 years, 10 years? Is anyone already doing this? I did find a company paying $50 per image, but that is for images not already producing revenue. Is it easy to verify how much an image is generating? Are you aware of any technical reasons the microstock agencies wouldn't allow the transfer of an image to another account. I assume I would just resubmit it. Note: I do not have an account with any stock agencies yet. Would moving an image from one account to another completely wipe out cash flow? Anything else I may be missing?
Thanks for your feedback, please keep the "I would never sell my copyright" comments off the thread, as I already know many would not sell their babies.
Thanks!
Hi! I have been experimenting over a year on this by hiring Illustrators to create some work for me. Send me a PM and I'll send you my contact info. Basically it's not as good as I thought it would be, but if you look it as a long term investment, I think this is something that can pay off. Normally we say that 1 image (I only do this with Illustration for now) usually generates 1$ per month. It's not always true, but for most Illustrations I pay for, I can manage to get back my initial investment in 6 month to 2 years. I am currently checking results for a large batch I have had produced in the last months. Can't say these are making awfully well, but revenue in microstock is not constant. You might make 100$ with a portfolio one month, and the next images can sell more and get you 300$, or the contrary. Right now I have a lot of money invested and I had a constant increase over the year, but since last April revenue stopped increasing, even decreased a bit or stalled. I am curious to see with the Summer months gone if it will go better. There is no assurance this can work, the worst you can get is that it takes 10 years to get your money back and start making money... In 10 years, you never know what will happen to the Microstock world too. All things to consider.
212
« on: September 03, 2012, 09:43 »
What i don't understand here is why somebody buy a image/illustration ( without people in it) with $480 and not using the file for sensitive purposes when they have the EL option for $100.
They must have different options and uses that is not possible with EL.
213
« on: August 03, 2012, 13:50 »
Good to hear things are working on the photo/ raster illustration side of things.
I hope they can pull their finger out and get this sorted for the vector guys too. It has literally been over a month since I reported the first bug, and not only has that not been fixed, there are now a couple more and far more serious problems. The latest making uploading impossible.
+1 I do only vectors, and for my last batch I had to pay someone to manually copy and paste the data manually as IPTC are not getting read at all, and it has been like this for several weeks. It is a pain. Hoping this will be fixed when I come back from vacation!!
214
« on: August 01, 2012, 23:34 »
finally got one of those fancy big sales. Not $120 but I guess I'll be content with $75
Congrats!!!  Sure puts a smile on any day. Didn't get any last month but ELs were up. Enjoy the extra $$ !
215
« on: July 27, 2012, 23:39 »
...but this is not what buyers want to buy. So you as I can see you find trace option in Illustrator or Corel which made you Illustrator Master Blaster as you present yourself.
If you are offended with my piffle fell free to tick IGNORE button (its not harder than press Scan or Trace button which you are using so often in you lets say work)
Good luck
Hope you fell better after this? So much hate and frustration in you, things must not be going well for you to be complaining about other peoples portfolio. I'm the one working on it, why should you care? 1st nonsense : ...but this is not what buyers want to buy.
How please enlighten us with your knowledge... What DO buyers want to buy? My earnings and download shows the contrary else I would have stopped doing this a year ago. 2nd nonsense: So you as I can see you find trace option in Illustrator or Corel which made you Illustrator Master Blaster as you present yourself.
Do you take drugs? Illustrator Master Blaster... Maybe find something less nerdy next time if you want to insult, just had a good laugh  . You try and do some of those type of image, you will see that there is a lot more than what you think you know. And for your reference I do have also 700 hand drawn color illustrations and 320 video. Not sure what is your point. Not my fault if you didn't get those type of commissions. Stop crying start working, maybe you'll see results. For my part I am not artistically proud of my portfolio, and I do know that it does not have the top level quality aspect your portfolio might have, but from a business point of view (yes this is a business, not an art gallery) I can say I would not switch my portfolio with yours  . There ARE buyers for these type of images, I see 3.3k of them saying it each month in Shutterstock.
216
« on: July 24, 2012, 20:38 »
I don't know about a trend or not, but I had a photograph sold with a $112 commission earlier this month on SS. Here's hoping for lots more!
Yes those sales sure do put a smile on our faces  To think of it, how many agencies tries to find a way for us contributor to earn MORE? (and by doing so, the agency also earn more
217
« on: June 21, 2012, 18:17 »
Nice. Here's hoping it becomes a trend.
I sure hope it becomes a trend! It sure did put a huge smile on my face. These we for 3 very ordinary technical illustrations in black lines on white of a flower bud (3 differents). I am confused as to what license was used for this, but I will sure not complain about it!
218
« on: June 20, 2012, 22:14 »
What a surprise today, 3x sales of 3 illustrations (nothing special about them) for a 120$ commission each... on Shutterstock... That beats my 90$ record of last time.
I find these new licenses more and more interesting, they keep growing up. What a surprise to see a weeks worth of income come in one day!
Anyone else got those high commissions?
219
« on: June 08, 2012, 21:47 »
In January I first mentioned this was coming up - Yesterday I became grandmother for first time!
photo video: [video revised, so this version has been deleted] smiles - Ann
*edited 5/30 to remove "link to nowhere"
Congratulations!! Can't see the video / photo though?
220
« on: May 02, 2012, 18:01 »
Shutterstock has a new logo. I think it's definitely better that the old one
Wow! Very nice corporate video too!
221
« on: May 02, 2012, 17:59 »
It's a special license a buyer purchases to use images in a "sensitive" nature i.e. medical, homelessness stuff like that. My brain is drawing a blank to explain it better.
The SU license gets the contributor up to $70 in royalties. Not sure what the $90 would fall under. So far they're not telling us anything unless it's them testing things out?
Thanks for th explanation. I can understand the meaning behind sensitive use. But for an illustration, I wouldnt think someone will buy a SU license... Confusing
222
« on: May 02, 2012, 17:12 »
Opted in.
Im opted in also, but I do Illustrations so no models for me.
223
« on: May 02, 2012, 17:10 »
I've had quite a few $18 dollar sales in the "single and other downloads" category, but not a $90 dollar one. I wonder if it is indeed the"sensitive use" license. My question to people who had them - is your portfolio "opted in" for the sensitive use?
Edit: Anita posted the reply to my question a minute earlier:)
I'll echo Elena's question. Anita, I know we determined the $18 sales were not sensitive use, but I haven't read that about the $90 and $75 sales. Like Elena, I haven't had any of those, and I am opted out of SU also.
Congrats to those of you who are getting those big sales! If they are not SU, I hope to join you soon 
I'm opted IN of SU... I never read any thing about SU, what exactly does it imply?
224
« on: May 02, 2012, 17:03 »
Is it image with people on it?
No, a simple b&w vector file of a tree... Nothing exceptionnal.
225
« on: May 02, 2012, 08:25 »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|