226
Dreamstime.com / Re: Planning on going exclusive at Dt
« on: July 28, 2010, 10:26 »
You can't use any other distributor (including Flickr, Zazzle, Alamy etc), but you can give them away from your own web page.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 226
Dreamstime.com / Re: Planning on going exclusive at Dt« on: July 28, 2010, 10:26 »
You can't use any other distributor (including Flickr, Zazzle, Alamy etc), but you can give them away from your own web page.
227
Yaymicro / Re: 10 free photos from YAY« on: July 19, 2010, 13:52 »
Strange that the sign-ip page was in English as well as Norwegian, then. Sorry for misleading you guys, but hope that those of us who have pics there will get some sales from the campain.
229
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Can't log in to istock« on: July 14, 2010, 17:48 »
How about now? It claims my login information is wrong. I tried to reset my password, and now:
Errors were encountered: There has been a security error Please fix all errors to continue. I think they ask a bit too much from one little person... Do you think they would be willing to narrow it down? Maybe just all errors committed in London? Or Europe? And where should I start? Spelling errors? Math? There are no errors on my machine. I can log in on all the other sites with no problems. 230
Dreamstime.com / Re: Planning on going exclusive at Dt« on: July 12, 2010, 11:35 »
@Komar: It took less than one month for me to quit the exclusivity status, not 6.
Why I was exclusive? I didn't know the back from the front of the camera when I started, and the staff of DT were very helpful during my learning process. Also, they "felt" safe and reliable. I was happy as an exclusive then, I'm happy as an independent now. But I'll never be more than a hobbyist. 231
Yaymicro / Re: 10 free photos from YAY« on: July 09, 2010, 04:03 »
I asked, and got this answer:
Fotografene fr selvsagt betalt som om kundene har kjpt bildepakkene. God sommer! Med vennlig hilsen, Linda L. Johannesen Translation: The photographers will of course be paid the same as if the customers had paid for the pictures. Have a good summer, Best regards, Linda L. Johannessen 232
Yaymicro / 10 free photos from YAY« on: July 08, 2010, 08:34 »
Yay has a campain now, where you can download 10 pics for free if you register in July via this link: http://yaymicro.com/register.action?extraMiniPack=true&la=en
If you are already registered at YAY, and want the same offer, send an email to [email protected] My username there is kavring, if you want to give me referrals. 233
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Contacted by an Istock customer. Price...« on: July 02, 2010, 15:59 »
I guess you are a member of Frskringskassan (national insurance)? That is usually good enough for all such purposes.
234
Newbie Discussion / Re: What stock topic to shoot in studio?« on: June 30, 2010, 02:16 »
Thank you!
![]() 235
Newbie Discussion / Re: What stock topic to shoot in studio?« on: June 29, 2010, 11:26 »
i got the cutest reject from Bigstock the other day:
Quote Reason: Potential copyright / trademark / privacy issue with photo (could be: copyrighted art, visible logo, license plate number, etc) sorry... That little bit of politeness really made my day. The issue is the tiny teddy bear thingy on this cap (as you can see, DT didn't object): http://www.dreamstime.com/little-child-playing-in-the-snow-thumb12463105.jpg 236
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Can't sumbit?« on: June 26, 2010, 09:50 »
Now all of istock is down. Isn't this happening a bit too frequently?
237
Shutterstock.com / Re: Reviewers allergy or global trend?« on: June 25, 2010, 07:23 »
Of the last 32 they took 7. I understood most of the rejects (old pics I have recently gotten around to keyword), but had expected to get maybe half of them approved.
238
Image Sleuth / Re: Stock Images on FlickR« on: June 23, 2010, 09:45 »
I get a virus warning when I try to open mysavingtips.
239
General Stock Discussion / Re: Getty taps into Flickr snappers« on: June 20, 2010, 19:32 »
Getty search for "child hearing aid": all relevant, but dated. http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2&language=en-US&family=creative&p=child%20hearing%20aid&assetType=image#
Istock search for the same phrase: http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&oldtext=child hearing aid&abstractType=1023&filterContent=false&text=child "hearing aid" Mostly relevant, almost all modern. Not something a lot of people will look for, but when they do, they need up do date pictures. Even the smallest hearing aids in getty's collection are twice the size of what kids use today. 240
General Stock Discussion / Re: Are successful pictures successful from the start?« on: June 12, 2010, 02:56 »
What would you consider a succesfull picture? 10, 50, 100, 500 DLs a month?
241
General Stock Discussion / Re: ITPC problems« on: June 02, 2010, 18:17 »
I use Irfanview, and only have problems with IS. All fields are blanked out there now.
242
General Stock Discussion / Re: How was your May, Earnings Breakdown« on: June 02, 2010, 04:29 »
My first month as independent, and I understand why you all love SS. The number of downloads and revenue from DT has been cut in half, but the RPD is about the same as before.
DT: 26% SS: 53% IS: 16% Other: 6% The total sum is quite low, but the trend is clear. I'm about halfway through uploading the old pictures, so SS will probably be good for another month or two. There is of course a larger backlog on IS. That really is a tiresome upload process. 243
DepositPhotos / Copyright infringement« on: May 24, 2010, 08:30 »
This file, a replica of a 1000 years old statuette, was declined by DP due to copyright infringement. I didn't know copyright extended that far back. But I'm probably a direct desendant of the artist, so maybe I should write them a PR? It was dug out of an Icelandic marsh, so I have no idea what the name of the artist was. Is that a problem?
![]() 244
123RF / Re: Rejects at 123rf to clear the pending queue?« on: May 21, 2010, 10:29 »
I haven't been able to get the upload to work for the last week or two. It just crashes.
245
General Photography Discussion / Re: www.spacesimages launches new Macro collection« on: May 21, 2010, 09:28 »
Great idea, and fantastic pictures!
246
General Stock Discussion / Re: Would you consider going fulltime on $200 a weekday?« on: May 13, 2010, 15:31 »You may not think so, but there would still be plenty of doctors, firefighters, clerks, and shelf-stockers to go around. Not *everyone* is trapped in a job they utterly dislike, you know. Well, the world is bigger than USA. In Norway 70% are happy with their current jobs. http://www.karrierelink.no/al.php?ar_id=977 I've tried being a WAHM, but prefer being amongst the 80 % who love teaching. At least part time. It is a bit to much hassle sometimes, having to work 6 hours every day. I think I would like to reduce it to 4. ![]() 247
Newbie Discussion / Re: Selling Stock Image's« on: May 01, 2010, 14:51 »the bigger the better? and use raw+jpg? i think there are some website that you can upload raw files as additional format (dreamstime), but i am not sure is it sold as higher price. At dreamstime you get a good price for raw if they buy with credits, but almost nothing for a sub. 248
General Photography Discussion / Re: Volcano photos« on: April 18, 2010, 14:40 »
Rainy summer? What summer? We just got 15 cm snow. Ok, snow is not that unusual in April, but not this much this late. We are close enough to the ash clouds that I think they could have caused it. The last time we had "A year without summer" it was caused by volcanos in Indonesia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer
249
Dreamstime.com / Re: Removing exclusivity« on: April 10, 2010, 06:38 »Gaja Welcome to the club and Good Luck! Thank you very much! 250
Dreamstime.com / Re: Removing exclusivity« on: April 10, 2010, 02:34 »If you are having to drop DT exclusivity to upload RM shots, then I guess you will also be uploading your RF portfolio to the other major sites? I will be uploading most of it, yes. It will be very interesting to see how it will effect my earnings. But I was really quite happy with exclusivity with DT. If not for this rule, I wouldn't have dropped it. Or if DT had a RM-scheme. But I do not want to sell more pictures of sensitive issues as RF. I have a few already in my port, and it doesn't feel right. Artemis: thank you for your good wishes. ![]() |
Submit Your Vote
|