|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - littleny
26
« on: February 15, 2017, 08:07 »
what do you guys prefer and why?
27
« on: February 14, 2017, 20:30 »
Sudden decrease by about 30%-40% since December. Shutterstock has obviously changed something. In my opinion it's the 'same artist' display. Used to be that a customer was able to view similar images by the same artist, now only your most popular images get displayed, often irrelevant to the customer search.
I'm in the USA and I find after 4:00 (16:00) sales practically stop for the rest of the day. Awful.
28
« on: February 13, 2017, 19:54 »
the whole thing is so dumb. and frustrating. today I'm uploading a batch from a historic notable cemetery in philadelpha called Laurel Hill Cemetery. I can't include the keyword 'laurel hill cemetery' and my only choices for 'laurel hill' are a basketball player and some other person.
29
« on: February 12, 2017, 16:20 »
It's not the search, and not necessarily spam.
I clicked on a totally egrecious file and found 'Madison Square Garden" in the keywords; but as all the other keywords were clean, I can say with 99.99% certainty that it is the nightmare scenario whereby the 'unification' is making lots of keywords go haywire.
I have found that important keywords are disappearing from my files and either being replaced by totally irrelevant keywords or irrelevant keywords are just mysteriously appearing.
I and many others have been complaining about this for months now on their keyword/search forum, and nothing 'seems' to be happening, and no-one official seems to give a d*mn.
It's to do with iS's and Getty's CV having diverged and they're having to unify them.
I wrote to support about one of my files in particular, on the grounds that we now cannot change keywords, and I wanted my keyword restored and the false one removed (with proof from DM that I had put the correct keyword and not the wrong one, I don't know if that still hold) and was told that they had no access to the file to change it.
One of the main reasons I haven't uploaded there for over six months.
Wow. This is so disturbing. I too have found completely irrelevant keywords in some of my files. Any way to change them after they've been upload and accepted?
30
« on: February 12, 2017, 16:05 »
i never paid much attention but today I'm on a mission and I'm searching for my images on the IS/getty site. I'm finding tons of weird stuff.
for instance, a search of 'madison square garden' produces this:
http://www.istockphoto.com/photos/madison-square-garden?excludenudity=true&page=1&phrase=madison%20square%20garden&sort=newest
is it possible that so many people either intentionally or unintentially used the keyword 'madison square garden' for their dog and vegetable gardens?
is there no quality control?
I don't know except it has garden in it? Sounds like a flawed search not spam.
i know. thanks Jim. even more concerning is why my images dont come up in the search results when clearly all the valid keywords on included on my file.
31
« on: February 12, 2017, 14:45 »
and why would a search of
new york city subway station entrance not produce this result when all these words are included in keywords?
[url]http://www.istockphoto.com/photo/new-york-city-subway-gm482859301-31214716/url]
33
« on: February 09, 2017, 11:04 »
I uploaded yesterday using the new V3. Today I'm getting an error that it can't find file/user/desktop. anyone else experiencing this?
34
« on: February 08, 2017, 07:48 »
I'm noticing more rejections the last month. i just had a batch rejected because the reviewer wants more information on the location..meanwhile i have quite a few images from this location that have been previously been accepted months ago. same keywords, same caption. not complaining, just an observation. was wondering if anyone else has noticed this as well.
35
« on: February 07, 2017, 21:07 »
Yeah well, their forum is awful. They move posts to other threads without notifying the OP. When I searched my own original threads, the links in my profile/account lead me to broken links. I later (after digging) find my posts moved and buried on a thread pages and pages long. I think the forum moderator there is OCD and overly concerned with tidying up and consolidating threads. I'm not interested and don't have the time to search pages and pages of conversations to see if my questions have been answered. Seems like a no brainer courtesy to let folks know their post has been moved.
36
« on: February 07, 2017, 21:04 »
I cannot wrap my head around the fact that iStock/Getty is not communicating with its members on such important thing as the current problem associated with ESP. Many people, myself included, didn't get the invite yet and many others are frantically trying to make sense of the whole thing. We must use this third party outlet to communicate among ourselves like survivors after the apocalypse.
I am shocked.
Well, no; we don't have to use this third party outlet; they are trying to sort things out on their own forum, as best they are able ...
[\quote]
Yeah well, their forum is awful. They move posts to other threads without notifying the OP. When I searched my own original threads, the links in my profile/account lead me to broken links. I later (after digging) find my posts moved and buried on a thread pages and pages long. I think the forum moderator there is OCD and overly concerned with tidying up and consolidating threads. I'm not interested and don't have the time to search pages and pages of conversations to see if my questions have been answered. Seems like a no brainer courtesy to let folks know their post has been moved.
37
« on: February 05, 2017, 09:07 »
i got my invitation. also downloaded deepmeta v3. but at this point i wouldn't upload with a 10 foot pole. things are so buggy and confusing right now. isnt it wiser to let them figure out and fine tune before hopping in?
38
« on: February 04, 2017, 08:56 »
ESP isnt even working for me today when i try to sign in on my desktop.
works fine on my iPhone.
i have an awful lot of money that i earn on IS and the PP. its awful to sit here and wonder if they'll really truly get things right lol or if everything will get gobbled up into a blackhole lol!
39
« on: February 04, 2017, 08:52 »
this morning i can only access ESP on my phone, not on my desktop. very buggy
40
« on: February 04, 2017, 08:45 »
hmm
41
« on: February 03, 2017, 12:34 »
sorry i need things spelled out for me more clearly and i didn't see any mention of partner program in the 2nd sticky at the getty forum (unless they call it something different)
my rent was due and PP covered a majority of it but haven't seen anything of these earnings calculated since November. So.. can someone tell me whats happening? Really appreciate it. thanks
42
« on: February 03, 2017, 07:56 »
the new ESP forum is awful to try to get information from. this unification is confusing hell.
can someone simply tell me where and when i will see my earnings from partner program royalties AND will these earnings be available on the ESP once its fully functional?
thanks sorry if this is redundant and has already been asked.
43
« on: January 27, 2017, 12:46 »
thats what i thought. i wonder how the upload process between the 2 portals compare as far as ease AND i wonder how the search ranking compares between the fotolia site and adobe.
44
« on: January 27, 2017, 12:35 »
I've been a contributor at FT for many years. do i or should i be doing something to prepare for the adobe portal? or is it just business as usual..continue to upload and keep my portfolio on FT?
45
« on: January 24, 2017, 17:05 »
thank You!
46
« on: January 24, 2017, 12:25 »
Does SS allow illustrations that have been auto traced from photographs (my own photographs)?
47
« on: January 21, 2017, 11:16 »
this is what happened.... if you can think of any other reasons I'd love to hear as optimising my sales and SEO on sites is an area of interest
i can't help but wonder if keyword order helps with 'best match' searches. If my photo of water has the keyword 'water' in the 15th position and you're photo of water has 'water' in the 1st position would that give your photo higher ranking in best match search?
48
« on: January 21, 2017, 08:51 »
hmmm, i really didn't think keyword order had any significance in search ranking at shutterstock. i guess comparing keyword order of popular vs best match of a single search word would be a good way to tell.
49
« on: January 21, 2017, 08:35 »
thats really annoying since 9 out of 10 times when i submit a nyc skyline pictures i get rejected cause the reviewer thinks the Empire State Building is too prominent. like i can help its a prominent skyscraper??
50
« on: January 20, 2017, 16:41 »
On the world map I see video sold but it doesn't show up on earnings summary!
Common bug, yet another one, probably no photo sales are showing, just that old video sale. I had that last month, next day all was back to normal. Or just try waiting 5 minutes, reload the page. But you're right it's a well known and repeating bug.
wow that's scary. how did you determine this? id like to do a test of my images as well
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
