26
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock
« on: July 10, 2022, 04:55 »
Not the same for motion graphics... maybe
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 26
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: July 10, 2022, 04:55 »
Not the same for motion graphics... maybe
27
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: July 02, 2022, 05:13 »Hi Mat,Thanks Mat,Or maybe this is because I'm submitting on the french Adobe Stock contributor site ?...Well after taking a look on the 'technical requirements' page, it is still recommended to "Avoid vertical or square framing" for video contents. it's ok, after reuploading proper 4k 2160x3840px videos, they have been accepted. I hope this format will bring some popularity in the buyers community and a new source of income (fingers crossed...) Thanks! 28
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 29, 2022, 12:10 »Thanks Mat,Or maybe this is because I'm submitting on the french Adobe Stock contributor site ?...Well after taking a look on the 'technical requirements' page, it is still recommended to "Avoid vertical or square framing" for video contents. after taking a look the files were exported with default settings on my after codec plug in putting them in 3840x2160. Apologize for all, I will submit a proper 2160x3840 and we'll see. Thank you very much for helping! 29
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 29, 2022, 11:09 »Or maybe this is because I'm submitting on the french Adobe Stock contributor site ?...Well after taking a look on the 'technical requirements' page, it is still recommended to "Avoid vertical or square framing" for video contents. Too early to start uploading I guess... 30
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 29, 2022, 10:46 »
Or maybe this is because I'm submitting on the french Adobe Stock contributor site ?...
![]() 31
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 29, 2022, 10:29 »
So I think i will be switching to the "no vertical uploads mode" until this is resolved
![]() 32
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 29, 2022, 10:19 »Thanks for answering.Hi Everyone, Well unfortunately it seems that the inspection staff should be informed of the acceptance of vertical videos, because I just submitted four 4k videos (2160x3840 px) which were refused for "technical reasons". For information it is similar adapted versions of normal 4k files which were all accepted... ![]() 33
Adobe Stock / Re: Vertical Video at Adobe Stock« on: June 27, 2022, 07:53 »Hi Everyone, Hi Matt, recently (some months ago) I uploaded animations in square format which were refused because of the format not accepted at the time. Do you think they should be accepted now ? Thx Benoit 34
Adobe Stock / Re: Majority of video sales on Adobe Stock are cheap 80-90% discount subs now.« on: June 23, 2022, 03:25 »
Thank you!!
I'm waiting for all the haters to come comment ridiculing me as usual though. lol [/quote] ... while WE should be the haters for being robbed this way by Adobe and the Thievery dream team Inc. (SS, Getty etc...) 35
Adobe Stock / Re: Introducing the free collection from Adobe Stock« on: June 09, 2022, 03:57 »Nobody is forcing you anything, and it's not free, you get 5$. [/quote] Wrong. If I'm hired for a job at 1000$/month, and suddenly it drops to 100$/month, am I forced to leave ? I think so. In this case I am earning 2,80$ instead of 28$, and 5,60$ instead of 56$. Take some time and do your math. And if your message was just another "take it or leave it", just give me a break. 36
Adobe Stock / Re: Introducing the free collection from Adobe Stock« on: June 08, 2022, 07:03 »Yes, and it feels like we are both the elephant in the room in this thread...Hello Mat,Thank you for the support, guess we both don't like licking boots so much. 37
Adobe Stock / Re: Introducing the free collection from Adobe Stock« on: June 07, 2022, 08:07 »
Hello Mat,
I appreciate your efforts and I think you're a nice person. But I think Chillswell in his message was rather referring to the new commission rate for videos. Yes we are not forced to submit our work into the free collection, but we are forced, and have no other choice than to accept that our videos are now sold with a price commission divided by 10... Unless Adobe Stock allows us to opt out from this plan (which would not be very complex to set up), it is nothing but pure robbery. Regards Benoit 38
Adobe Stock / Re: Introducing the free collection from Adobe Stock« on: June 07, 2022, 07:42 »
Well said. +++ 39
Adobe Stock / Re: Very Angry After Adobe Stock« on: June 03, 2022, 09:26 »
More and more 2,80 and 5,60 video commissions :-( A bunch of old licenses (28 and 56, sometimes 70) still sold but probably the last. Video income actually divided by 10.
Dear Adobe Stock, welcome to the Istock/Shutterstock greedy family. (yes complaining, that's all we have left) 40
Adobe Stock / Re: Very Angry After Adobe Stock« on: May 21, 2022, 04:35 »
There is Always a higher level of greed with stock agencies
#adobestockisthenewshutterstock 41
Adobe Stock / Very Angry After Adobe Stock« on: May 20, 2022, 12:35 »
Adobe Stock has shutterstocked us. Same amount of videos as monthly usual, but big drop in revenue.
Thank you very much for this ! ![]() 42
Adobe Stock / Re: Diable Adobe Stock Videos« on: May 20, 2022, 03:50 »
Adobe Stock has shutterstocked us.
43
Image Sleuth / Re: Another Shutterstock Thief Account« on: May 16, 2022, 03:39 »
I said that under anger :-) But i'm not sure it can be worst than now
44
Image Sleuth / Another Shutterstock Thief Account« on: May 15, 2022, 04:37 »
I found a lot of my videos inside this port:
https://www.shutterstock.com/fr/g/octafloresvia/video You may find some of yours... I won't send any millionth DMCA notice to this garbage Shitterstock company I hate. PS: please Mr Musk, could you buy this agency and fire all these bxstxrds ? 45
Adobe Stock / Re: Diable Adobe Stock Videos« on: April 21, 2022, 03:28 »
Same here what a shame...
46
Adobe Stock / Re: Video Royalties To Drop« on: April 04, 2022, 03:55 »Masybe I was reading the new earnings breakdown fast and my brain froze. The least would have been to allow contributors to opt out from this and "decide" whenever they want to have a loss of income... 47
Off Topic / Re: Message to all Russians in these forums« on: March 04, 2022, 13:50 »Dear Russian friends, I know there is a significant stock photographers community, so I have an appeal to you. Where did you see any apology of Poutine in this quote ? You're the kind of people reaching the godwin point in 1 nanosecond. People who don't read history books, which are made to help making relevant comparison, makes me vomit. If I say Putin did not bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki what will you say ![]() 48
Off Topic / Re: Message to all Russians in these forums« on: March 04, 2022, 05:32 »Dear Russian friends, I know there is a significant stock photographers community, so I have an appeal to you. Please do not confuse any population in the world with their politicians. Please, first before lecturing any citizen from any country, do not believe in your own country's media propaganda. I have much sympathy for both ukrainians and russians, yet I don't think my little person & my personal opinions/feelings/believes/thoughts can have any influence on geopolitical events, as terrible as they can be, but unfortunately that's how we are educated and accustomed to think in most of western countries. And Putin is not Hitler. 49
Shutterstock.com / Re: stupid rejection tricks« on: February 15, 2022, 04:18 »
Dumbest stock agency ever
50
General Stock Discussion / Any artist paying to promote their videos on Instagram ?« on: February 04, 2022, 13:35 »
I wonder if it is worth the effort just by curiosity ?
I make enough money with stock agencies, but I was wondering if I could bring buyers to my own agency via Instagram (which I don't know very much) Any opinion welcome Have a great WE! |
Submit Your Vote
|