251
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock rebound?
« on: January 17, 2009, 04:32 »
Also, I have noticed iStock google advertisements on various sites that I frequently visit. Never saw them before so its definitely something new.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 251
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock rebound?« on: January 17, 2009, 04:32 »
Also, I have noticed iStock google advertisements on various sites that I frequently visit. Never saw them before so its definitely something new.
252
iStockPhoto.com / iStock rebound?« on: January 17, 2009, 03:42 »
Is anyone else having a dramatic increase in sales this month? They have definitely changed the best match because some of my files are appearing on the front page in some searches when before I was unable to even find any of my photos. If things keep up iStock might have its best month since February 2008 and be my top earner this month. Anyone else seeing a change? Also, has anyone noticed whether new files are getting exposure again or if they are still buried as soon as they are approved?
253
General Stock Discussion / Re: Bundled earning from all the stock sites« on: January 14, 2009, 19:37 »
It is a great idea and would be a nice tool for the submitters. Someone just needs to figure out a way to get the microstock sites on board.
254
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS should introduce daily upload limit!« on: January 14, 2009, 13:25 »
Meh I just wish they would change there search so you don't have to constantly feed the beast to maintain decent sales. (Some claim this doesn't happen to them -- I don't believe them)
255
Adobe Stock / Re: Are you wishing Fotolia to be the new Istock?« on: January 14, 2009, 13:20 »
Like many others here, I am rooting for Dreamstime to take the lead. So far this month they are in 1st for me. But Shutterstock is catching up after a slow start.
256
iStockPhoto.com / Re: When is it.. (OK).. to complain about poor sales..« on: January 07, 2009, 15:36 »What contributors don't realise is a sale for us is the end product.A sale for a buyer is probably at the beginning of a project and alot of buyers WONT be buying everyday as they will be working on said project/design. Yes I'm sure none of us are smart enough to figure that out. Thank you for enlightening us poor unintelligent sobs with your endless wisdom. What oh what would we do without you. 257
iStockPhoto.com / Re: When is it.. (OK).. to complain about poor sales..« on: January 06, 2009, 22:04 »That reminds me; I'm curious. When does your posting ban lift at istock? And when that happens, will we be graced less frequently with your presence here? I certainly have my fingers crossed. ![]() 258
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Best Match 2.0« on: January 05, 2009, 14:11 »
There has definitely been a change. What were at the bottom of my gallery before (top selling files) are now at the front.
EDIT: A quick search using one of the most relevant and popular keywords showed my photo on the 1st page 2nd photo. It is actually possible to find my images in the search again woo. 259
General Stock Discussion / Re: Do you use Mac or PC for your photography/creative art workflow and why« on: January 04, 2009, 21:40 »Mac. No viruses, no threats, no registry cleaning, no overall system cleaning, no HDD defragmentation, no chance for the configuration to become obsolete in 3 yrs, no custom assembled chinese desktops. The 1 virus I have gotten using a PC was because I was greedy and tried to rip a program. It took me about 10 minutes to get rid of the virus by doing system restore and all was fine. I have no firewall and no anti-virus/spyware applications. The solution to avoiding viruses is nothing more than intelligence. The configuration is going to become obsolete in time no matter OS you have. The difference is how easy and cost effective you can update your machine so it is not as obsolete. Microsoft wins in that category hands down. 260
General Stock Discussion / Re: December 2008 earnings breakdown« on: January 01, 2009, 15:14 »Site - %income/dec - %income/08 - %change/nov ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shutterstock - 33% - 31% - 27% Dreamstime - 24% - 18% - 33% Best Month Ever StockXpert - 9% - 15% - 5% Istockphoto - 8% - 12% - 11% Fotolia - 8% - 11% - 11% Crestock - 7% - 5% - 14% Bigstockphoto - 6% - 5% - 8% 123RF - 5% - 3% - 183% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Overall - 100% - 100% - 19% Comments & Explanations: - Enhanced license at Shutterstock helped it beat November. - Dreamstime is closing in on Shutterstock to become my top earner. I wouldn't be surprised if this happens in Q1 2009. I really like DT and hope the trend continues. - Istock up slightly over november, but down like 60% over december 2007. - Even though I can't get anything new accepted to Crestock, the stuff that is already accepted has been selling more often. - 123RF was so horrible last month that the 183% increase this month is still disappointing. - Snapvillage, Canstockphoto, Featurepics..... not even worth mentioning. Less than .5% combined so I just left them off. I no longer upload to any of them. 261
General Stock Discussion / Re: Christmas day Downloads?« on: December 27, 2008, 16:20 »
On the 25th I got:
1 on SS 1 on DT 1 on 123RF 26th and 27th are similar. 262
General Stock Discussion / Re: Were you Happy with 2008?« on: December 24, 2008, 18:27 »
Made less per month in 2008 than in 2007 despite increasing my portfolio size by about 30%. So no not really that happy with 2008 stats, it seems you have to constantly and drastically increase your portfolio size each year just to maintain the same level of income. Too much * competition these days.
![]() 263
Off Topic / Re: Share your weather« on: December 20, 2008, 17:37 »
Southern Florida:
*** [ WEATHER ]: Conditions: Scattered Clouds Temperature: 77.7F/25.4C Wind: West at 0.0mph/0.0kmh 264
General Stock Discussion / Re: For Independent Submitters Only: What Stock Agency Do You Feel Is Best?« on: December 19, 2008, 18:14 »
I say Dreamstime as well for the same reasons as the others have posted. They are also not my top earning site.
265
Crestock.com / Re: Crestock Rejects?« on: December 13, 2008, 17:06 »
Just had a 100% rejection as well.
![]() If they re-reviewed all their accepted images under these standards, they would prolly have less than 1,000 files left. I know all of mine would be rejected. 266
Shutterstock.com / Re: mouse over previews at SS« on: December 13, 2008, 00:52 »
There is no option for it when using Opera.
![]() 267
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock raises the bar« on: December 10, 2008, 02:17 »An istock admin has confirmed that the Premier Collection is for istock exclusive contributors only. Good. Let them charge 10x as much for exclusive content, that would improve our sales. I doubt buyers care if an image is exclusive or not especially when there is no difference in quality between the two. 268
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Spamming = more sales« on: December 09, 2008, 02:43 »I really like limiting keywords to 10-15 words. If you can't get your message across in ten words there is something wrong. There is nothing wrong with his link. It must be your computer. Don't be so quick to attack him. 269
Shutterstock.com / Re: I'm sorry - I mean no offense to the photographer, but....« on: December 05, 2008, 12:48 »
Could be computer generated as well.
270
Adobe Stock / Re: Contributor ranking changing« on: December 04, 2008, 20:27 »
Just reinfoces the need for a type of Microstock Photographers Union. Someone with a big name needs to start it in order for it to become influential. Maybe this is your calling Bobby.
271
StockXpert.com / Re: Comment & View the Image Above Yours! [Helps Search Rank]« on: December 04, 2008, 13:48 »272
Shutterstock.com / Re: 'On Demand' percentage - November 2008« on: December 04, 2008, 13:39 »
8.9%
273
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Do u also have files stuck in approval queue??« on: December 03, 2008, 17:25 »
Nope. Haven't bothered to upload since the new best match gives new files no exposure.
Plus I'm lazy and IS is horrendous to upload to. 274
SnapVillage.com / Re: Is Snapvillage hibernating?« on: December 01, 2008, 21:20 »0 sales for me in NOV Hah. I beat leaf. I got one sub sale. ![]() 275
General Stock Discussion / Re: November 2008 earnings breakdown« on: December 01, 2008, 14:48 »Site - % income - %change/october - %change/year avg. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shutterstock - 30% - 19% - 25% Dreamstime - 21% - 5% - 3% StockXpert - 11% - 36% - 43% Fotolia - 10% - 13% - 30% Crestock - 9% - 5% - 27% Istockphoto - 9% - 70% - 48% Bigstockphoto - 7% - 71% - 6% 123RF - 3% - 10% - 41% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Overall - 100% - 7% - 23% Comments: First off, I uploaded very little in 2008, only about 85 files. So that is a big cause for the large drops. 70% rise in income at Istock over last month doesn't say much when October was my worst month ever, even below my first month uploading. The 48% decrease compared to my typical month there says more about how IS is doing. This was my worst month of the year, not by much though. Things are already looking good for December with an EL already from SS, and strong sales on other sites including Istock. Did they change the best match again or something? The past 10 days have been A LOT better than the 40 before them. |
|