276
General Stock Discussion / Re: Interesting interview by John Lund about macro and microstock
« on: September 01, 2012, 19:20 »
.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 276
General Stock Discussion / Re: Interesting interview by John Lund about macro and microstock« on: September 01, 2012, 19:20 »
.
277
iStockPhoto.com / Re: OhGodHepMe! iStock is accepting Mobile Photography.« on: August 29, 2012, 16:40 »This isn't news. They've been accepting images from iPhones for at least six months. Today's iStock Fuel Newsletter just made it official 278
iStockPhoto.com / OhGodHepMe! iStock is accepting Mobile Photography.« on: August 29, 2012, 16:30 »
Mobile Photography
Social media defines the trends in imagery right now. People want images that look and feel like those streaming past second-by-second online. We think the best way to deliver that is to encourage mobile photography submissions from our contributors. Dunno if this is a good thing...or not. But expect the floodgate opening from everybody with a mobile camera. And then there will be the blog posts "YOU CAN MAKE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AT ISTOCKPHOTO WITH YOUR IPHONE CAMERA!" 279
Image Sleuth / Re: copyright infringement« on: August 07, 2012, 14:32 »
What you want to do (get money for infringement) IS the right thing to do. No question there.
My point is it is unlikely you will get anything unless you use scare tactics and that is iffy. Show me ONE full case-study where a microstock photographer won an infringement case and collected money for some images on a small website. and then I will shut . up ![]() 280
Image Sleuth / Re: copyright infringement« on: August 06, 2012, 22:04 »Let's keep it real. And your effective course of action is? 281
Image Sleuth / Re: copyright infringement« on: August 06, 2012, 15:40 »
Let's keep it real.
First you have to file in the correct jurisdiction for a small claims case since this is not a civil case. Then file a bunch of paper work and have them served assuming you can find out who you are actually suing. Then they have to show up which they won't. So you get some judgement by default for a few grand. Now you have to collect but you don't know their bank account number. And they have taken the images down and you've spent MANY hours of time pissed off and paying for court filing fees when you could be taking photos and making money. 282
Image Sleuth / Re: copyright infringement« on: August 06, 2012, 02:04 »
Good luck with that. Not much you can do but ask to take down. I am not being a wise ass just stating the truth. Suing them? Where? How much? Small Claims? Sick Getty lawyers on them or Corbis. They only chase down the massive infringements. It's like stopping snow flakes from hitting the ground.
283
General - Top Sites / Re: SS/IS rankings« on: August 04, 2012, 20:43 »
and what about all the bots scraping data for the microstock data sites? how is that figured?
284
New Sites - General / Re: Plusgram - selling instragram photos as stock« on: August 04, 2012, 18:55 »
I don't get it. Any mac user could do a simple command-shift-4 and do a screen grab of the image. Do they really think folks don't know this stuff.
285
General Stock Discussion / Re: August off to terrible start« on: August 04, 2012, 18:51 »
Dude chill -- it has only been four days and one was a weekend.
![]() 287
Bigstock.com / Re: donate your photo to the homepage, no comm?!« on: July 28, 2012, 23:50 »"We may select one of your images to be featured for free on the homepage. This helps showcase your portfolio. Please note that you will not earn commissions on the image that is selected during that week." Free exposure for your entire portfolio to millions of buyers. And your problem with that is...? ![]() 288
General Photography Discussion / Re: Business acquired from having Facebook account« on: July 28, 2012, 23:47 »
Think of your marketing as multifaceted and facebook is just one part of a marketing mix. Include a great website with SEO. Write blog articles and get them published with link backs. Use facebook and linkedin for other connections. Try Youtube for info videos about your knowledge. Its all just marketing and FB is just another fishing line in the lake.
289
iStockPhoto.com / Re: H&F presses on with $4 billion Getty Images sale« on: July 28, 2012, 23:40 »Carlyle, CVC, TPG weigh final bids for Getty - Reuters And this is why, I believe, we have not seen our 2012 RC levels. They will let the new buyers deal with that. I am hoping the new owners do not impose the 20% for all like the Getty main collection. But with Getty's debt load and investors squeezing them dry -- who knows. On the other hand, there will always be millions of buyers for low cost images and great portfolios will sell well even if they have to move around to where the buyers migrate to. 290
General Photography Discussion / Re: Shooting in a medieval church« on: July 26, 2012, 02:27 »1600ws is a lot more than I have, but my local dealer has Elinchrom 1200ws studio strobes for rent. This weekend I'll be visiting the church for the first time (during an exhibition), so I can check out the color of the ceilings (and height). OOPs I meant low ISO... it was 100 ![]() 291
General Photography Discussion / Re: Shooting in a medieval church« on: July 25, 2012, 03:10 »
I recently shot a racquetball court with high ceilings and just aimed my White Lightening 1600 ws at the ceiling and got plenty of bounce light to shoot at high ISO at around f/8.0. I just used small reflectors with no softbox and let it blast away. It may not work for you but it is a thought. Good luck.
292
Site Related / Re: I quit the forum« on: July 19, 2012, 22:11 »
Leaf has his IP address and knows his game. Sock puppets cannot hide from admin.
![]() 293
Site Related / Re: I quit the forum« on: July 19, 2012, 09:58 »
Two things anyone should know about making a thread to broadcast they're leaving a forum:
- half of the members don't care - the other half are glad to see you go ![]() 294
iStockPhoto.com / Vetta? Really?« on: July 18, 2012, 12:02 »
I can't figure out what the Vetta inspectors think is Vetta quality. Apparently - since I've never got anything accepted. Go take a look at recent files. Really? Sure some of it is awesome and fits the criteria below but there are many others images that make ya wonder what the inspectors saw that allowed it to pass through the Vetta golden gates.
Here is how iStock describes Vetta: Content in the Vetta collection, Italian for peak, has seized its own artistic destiny and created a whole new caliber of art. Vetta content is handpicked by a team of top-rate iStockphoto editors for: -Exquisite art direction -Intelligently executed concepts -Rarity 295
General Stock Discussion / Re: $10 Million a Year in Sight for Yuri Arcurs - New Interview Released Today« on: July 16, 2012, 15:59 »I was never in it for the simple life and the million dollar income. I could stop tomorrow and never have to work a day in my life, but then why do I keep going? Steve Jobs was as worth $25 Million at 25-years-old. He said, It was not about making money. It was about making great products and putting a dent in the universe.. Go get'em Yuri. You are young, talented and ambitious. Make some dents my friend. ![]() 296
General Stock Discussion / Re: Will Yuri's peopleimages.com dominate lifestyle photography?« on: July 15, 2012, 18:12 »
His business model concerns me. With 100 full time staff and 4 million in sales things could be tight. Numbers don't lie and I assume he has a sharp CFO, but it feels like an urgent and perhaps overly ambitious venture.
And his mentor program is training tons of Mini-Me Yuris that will take their skills and start their own microtock accounts or perhaps website. It has already happened. And no non-compete clause can stop it. He may also be maxing out on his main subject matter of happy, shiny business, beach, spa, family photos. I mean, how many ways can you shoot that stuff? I see he also has some food shots and concept images. Huh? I thought this was People Images. Ok, so sell that other stuff and music and video but... um perhaps peopleimages.com is a limiting URL? 297
General Stock Discussion / Re: Will Yuri's peopleimages.com dominate lifestyle photography?« on: July 15, 2012, 16:13 »Yes, I'm thinking of quitting and getting a job at Target. That is a key point. His stuff is kinda antiseptic... but he is not stupid. I am sure he is aware of that and will diversify his content. But on the other hand, that stuff sells like crazy. Sure, many discerning art directors will gravitate from that look, but a million regular folks will eat it up indefinitely. I am sure we will hear from him on this thread soon ![]() 298
General Stock Discussion / Will Yuri's peopleimages.com dominate lifestyle photography?« on: July 15, 2012, 09:04 »
Consider the state of microstock sites' inventory. It is mostly massive quantities of about 80% weak images (crap) and growing. Searching for quality images is difficult and will become more so.
That is the nature of amateur crowd sourcing business models (even though I feel the same about RM). So, here comes Yuri and peopleimages.com. It changes the game with 90%+ cherries. Searches are significantly more productive using his Model Properties and Search Options. It blows away RM in regards to pricing. He has built a massive, prolific photo factory churning out 5,000 quality images a week!. Currently, peopleimages.com is in its infancy much like iStockphoto was in 2000. They were a game-changer. Once the years roll by and PI gets traction, loyalty, word-of-mouth, a strong organic Google placement and Adwords presence, it may also become a game-changer for people/lifestyle photos and perhaps dominate people stock photography worldwide. 299
General Stock Discussion / Re: Do you have Make-up and Hair on your shoots?« on: July 13, 2012, 10:31 »
I have the women do their own MU and it has worked out fine. I have some light powder for shine issues when needed on the face. I shoot mostly lifestyle and fitness but if doing glamour I would think a MUA would be important. I don't shoot those glamour shots since there is so much of that and I doubt it is a big seller for microstock.
300
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock will start accepting digital releases (from smart phone apps)« on: July 12, 2012, 16:37 »
They said it will be available in the next few weeks -- much like .png files and logo submissions, ya think?
![]() ![]() |
|