Also again a reminder we must have portfolios on many different agencies.

Oh, it reminds me the advices we read on forums 15 years ago. Really, making an update and restarting is always a good idea. But well, you are the teacher, sorry for my insolence.

I only made it through about half of your DT (AI) portfolio, but I'd wonder if the four pink Cadillac images would be a problem

The title names them and the logo is pretty close to the real thing:

https://blog.logomyway.com/cadillac-logo/

For contributors who've been with Adobe Stock over a certain time (let's say one year), blocking a whole portfolio over what is, essentially a reviewing error on Adobe's part as well as an error on the contributor's part, seems extreme

I looked at some of the items with piles of boxes on a doorstep to see if there were logos there and didn't see anything I recognized (there was one big black check mark that could perhaps have looked like the amazon prime curved arrow).

I saw an iMac shape with no logo and I think Adobe Stock is allowing those in AI generated images (based on how many there are). A champagne bottle with gibberish text and a logo-like "seal" might have caused trouble - typically stock has to have plain geometric shapes to avoid inspectors seeing a logo.

Good luck figuring this out

Congratulations Jo Ann, you spent all your time pointing out the issues with these AI images that shouldn't be accepted, you got Adobe to react and act in the right way. Carry on!

Quote from: Madoo on August 14, 2023, 00:18

Quote from: cobalt on August 13, 2023, 04:50

I have been doing this for nearly 20 years.

Woooooow !

Nearly 20 years ?  And your photos still look like they are created with mobile phone for the social media story post : "look what I just eat for breakfast" ?

Well...

But how dare you talk to a person like that?
And who do you think you are?Do you think you are better than someone else?
But no one has taught you a minimum of respect?

Why ignore that there can be people more competent than others? oh yes, with AI generation, everybody's equal in term of skills, that is a big change...  for others

Are you writing this against Madoo or cobalt? I'm not sure that the person you denounce as being pretentious is the right one here. Which of the two believes and defines herself as an expert?

�Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge...� Charles Darwin

Quote from: cobalt on August 10, 2023, 13:27

You are making me a better ai artist...

AI ARTIST ? 

If someone who uses Ai is artist....person with a remote control is movie director. 

Loghorrea Artist, that's for sure, but for the rest? I feel incompetent to assess... 

[...] otherwise it's useless to complain in blind mode

So true, it's much better in hidden mode! 

Quote from: Her Ugliness on July 19, 2023, 04:29

Yeah, right. Customers don't have 5 seconds of time to write a promt in an AI generator - pretty much the same time that it take to enter the same text in a microstock search bar -  but they have time browsing collections for inspirations?

Such naivity....

But it doesn't work this way.
To have a nice result you have to adjust, change, modify, and try multiple variations [...]

Oh... little dear... really?

I think it also happened to me - Though I can't say for sure, because when I look at the image, it only tells me whether it's Ai generated or not, not whether it is a photo or illustration - But I do not understand why this is even possible on Adobe's end. AI generated images must be submitted as illustrations, so the combination of checking the "Ai content" checkbox and selecting the photo catergory instead of illustration category should simply lead to an error message.

Checked: photos
Checked: Generative AI Only
181,533 results in all
Why did Adobe Stock became so... untrustable... and GREEDY?

I agree, just "pushing a button" is not what makes our images sell. Just "writing a prompt" is not what I do when I create content with the assistance of ai. The whole research, mood board, concept, design choices for color, lighting, angles....it does not happen by itself.

Realize that you only enjoy being a tool for AI, that is what you are. And in a near future, this tool will become obsolete. After all, you already decided to become obsolete for taking photos.

Generalized mediocrity, at all levels...
What is mediocre, false, is favored.

Adobe is making a fool of itself here by allowing contributors to feed the image database with all these laughable, pathetic productions. Customers will soon go buy their images elsewhere, at more serious image providers, that's a shame. They will quickly understand the risk of buying visuals that can make a professional publication ridiculous, especially for inconsistencies that would not be visible at first glance.
But maybe Adobe plans to work more with humorous social networks than with communication agencies, that can be a choice, why not. But I remain surprised.

I think that Adobe would have to benefit from closing the accounts of these "producers" of images who do not even control what they drop en masse in revision. 
In some time, cleaning the database will be very difficult with these millions of images which are validated without even having been inspected. Adobe will need a lot of volunteers to do this work. Times have changed.

Adobe Stock has a Discord server for contributors and it now includes a "Quality-Control" channel where contributors can post links to images that should not have been accepted in the first place, and these will be passed on to moderation for re-consideration.

When will "Quality-Control" channel where contributors could inspect the bin where real photographies should not have been placed in the first place, and these would be passed on to moderation for re-consideration?

BETTER?

I feel sorry but... No.
Why do you never check the images that AI generates for you! It might help you understand some pitfalls
Here is a correction:

I hope you did not already upload it to the stock sites! You should correct this before.
There are buyers who learned reading and writing, even for a language other than their mother tongue 

I think you are not interested in making money.
If you were ranting against people using ai to sneak them into art competitions instead of paining their own content or fake ai editorial images to be used by evil people on the internet for disinformation, I would happily join you in the crusade.
But you only seem to be here on some weird mission against being productive in stock.
Plenty of agencies don�t take ai. Why not just focus on them and create a stand out killer portfolio?

Ok mom. I'm going to tidy my room now.