|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - MPfoto71
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21
326
« on: July 05, 2023, 18:03 »
I'll try again: How do I delete an image that was put into the Data Catalog by SSTK? I just got my answer from Shutterstock support, as I was asking them the same question together with a second question: The answers are as follows (translated with Deepl.com from german to english) Question 1 was: How can I delete an image, which has been only allowed for the data catalog? Answer from Shutterstock: " Secondly, regarding the possibility to remove content from the data catalogue; however, this will not be possible, We have added an option in the account settings to decline the inclusion of your content in future records. I invite you to read the following article for more details: Shutterstock Data Licensing and the Anbieter Fund" Question 2 was: Where can I see the rejection reason why an image is only put to the dataset section? Answer from Shutterstock: " Shutterstock has introduced Data Licensing, a new earning opportunity that will include content that would not normally meet the criteria and technical requirements of our regular Creative Marketplace for computer vision training. The selection criteria for content to be added to our data catalogue will be based on submissions that do not meet Shutterstock's technical specifications and quality standards. You will not be able to appeal this decision or submit the asset to the Creative Marketplace for consideration as usual, as it will be rejected because the content has already been accepted." To sum up briefly: -> you can no longer delete images from the data catalogue (not even at some point in the future), you can only withdraw consent to the data catalogue before submitting images -> no detailed reason is given why an image "only" ends up in the data catalogue -> You cannot resubmit images that have been accepted into the data catalogue because they are now considered accepted. All in all, the data catalogue solves some problems for Shutterstock regarding multiple submissions, support, etc. Very clever from the company's point of view - another slap in the face for us image submitters. Have a nice day
327
« on: June 26, 2023, 09:39 »
You go to your Adobe account (website) and select free under "filter by price level" - then you see all the photos in the FreeCollection.
You can then count through them quite quickly :-)
328
« on: June 26, 2023, 09:25 »
Got paid too today ... In my case, 18 out of 776 qualified images were selected.
That would be a pretty disappointing result if it stays that way.
329
« on: June 22, 2023, 17:42 »
Oh great, thank you!
I could have thought of that too ;-)
330
« on: June 22, 2023, 15:16 »
When I try to looking my earnings the page just says "Incorrect usage of CUBE/ROLLUP and ORDER BY"... anyone else with that and an idea how to fix that?
Tried Chrome, Edge on Win 10 and 11...
331
« on: May 12, 2023, 13:10 »
To clarify, the date range you see in your pending files is based on the date you uploaded the image to the Adobe Stock contributor portal, not the date you actually submit the file for review. If you uploaded a file and wait for a while before submitting, the time pending you see will be longer than the actual time it has been in the queue.
That said, I acknowledge the wait time is still significant but progress is being made. We appreciate your patience.
-Mat Hayward
Thank you very much for the constant information!
It's good to know that things are progressing :-)
Have a nice day, Michael
Why these compliments? You look like a groupie. And is his real name Michael? I thought it was just Mat.
You could give complements to Mat if he would explain why this delay is happening. Most likely due to a massive inflow of AI images but that is not what he is sharing. He is leaving you in the dark, as usual, but you think it's great that he informs you. Djeez.
Hello SVH, I think it's simply good that someone from a stock agency talks to us at all and keeps us up to date - it's perfectly acceptable to be polite and say thank you, even if this concept is apparently alien to you :-) And my name is Michael (not his name), as it is usually added at the end of a note/email/etc. ;-) And if you don't like me being polite, then please do us both a favour and keep your opinion to yourself! Have a nice day, Michael
332
« on: May 10, 2023, 16:04 »
To clarify, the date range you see in your pending files is based on the date you uploaded the image to the Adobe Stock contributor portal, not the date you actually submit the file for review. If you uploaded a file and wait for a while before submitting, the time pending you see will be longer than the actual time it has been in the queue.
That said, I acknowledge the wait time is still significant but progress is being made. We appreciate your patience.
-Mat Hayward
Thank you very much for the constant information! It's good to know that things are progressing :-) Have a nice day, Michael
333
« on: April 26, 2023, 08:56 »
@Dave: Thats a nice sale indeed - congrats! 
334
« on: April 15, 2023, 11:16 »
Some of my images are at 29 days now... hopefully this will change soon, 830 images in the queue and more than 1400 waiting to be uploaded.
335
« on: April 07, 2023, 15:21 »
I would not invest time there - my about 20k images are doing something aroung $10 a month.
Sales are $0,25 each, never below, never above.
336
« on: March 20, 2023, 13:38 »
February was a little below average for me.
Video Rpd: $2.38
Foto Rpd: $0.65
337
« on: March 18, 2023, 17:35 »
In 2022 I had over all agencies 360 video sales -> 2 of those sale were at DT with $3,70 each for me.
338
« on: March 13, 2023, 19:05 »
My "2023 Pond5" so far:
- 15 videos sales with an RpD of $3,62 (which is very low)
Video portfolio size is about 3.000
- 1 image sales with an RpD of $2,13
Image portfolio size is about 20.000
Pond5 is really not doing well in 2023 so far
339
« on: November 19, 2022, 19:34 »
Hello,
Is there actually a site that accepts VR180 images?
Something like the attached image.
A photographer friend of mine does a lot in this field and asked me about it - since I didn't know the answer, I thought I'd throw the question in here :-)
Alamy has a special section for 360 degree images as far as I know, but I haven't come across VR180 yet.
Greetings
340
« on: November 18, 2022, 15:47 »
still the most boring poster on this forum. no one cares what you have to say mate. give it up, I haven't been on the forum as long as others - but I can't understand the attack on Uncle Pete either. Information was simply provided for everyone and that's just a nice touch.
341
« on: November 16, 2022, 16:15 »
Today for the first time ever I had a 3 digit sale - those do exists 
342
« on: November 10, 2022, 13:07 »
Michael, I wouldn't take that too seriously.
If the only person here, who apparently has all day time to flood the forum with contributions, receives zero approval for it and then calls all others trolls - that speaks volumes.
Annoying just a bit to read here. Is at the moment somehow groundhog day here: stoker2014, stoker2014 .....  Don't worry - I've probably been out of the age where this upsets me for a while :-) It's more like an annoying squeak under the shoe and somehow also amusing.
343
« on: November 10, 2022, 10:47 »
Sry - double post
344
« on: November 10, 2022, 10:46 »
I can give more than one
I'm waiting for a link. Or are you a liar!
Someone's education has definitely failed - throwing around accusations and insults like 'liar' should actually be enough for a ban, shouldn't it? Have a nice day@All
345
« on: November 10, 2022, 08:26 »
Just 2 days ago a simple sand ground sold for $18,59 - liked that one :-)
346
« on: October 18, 2022, 12:24 »
Thank you for letting us know :-)
347
« on: October 12, 2022, 17:45 »
Perhaps a little calculation will help to assess how to value the $8 offer for the Free Collection (just crossed my mind):
For photos, $5 is offered in the Free Collection with a minimum sale price of $0.33-$0.38 depending on account status - so about a 13:1 ratio ( 5 / 0.38 = 13.15).
If we now extrapolate the $8 in the Free Collection offer for videos to the minimum price for videos, which as far as I know is $2.80, this should actually result in a 13:1 ratio for the video offer of $2.80*13 = $36.40 per Free Video.
(If the $2.80 is not the minimum price for videos, please correct me here).
So the $8 seems like a very bad deal to me...
Don't get me wrong, AS is certainly one of the better platforms for us providers, but this offer is not a good one.
348
« on: October 11, 2022, 11:11 »
In principle, I find the FreeCollection offers quite good, but $8 for a video clip does not seem to me to be in proportion to $5 for a photo.
I will definitely not participate in this programme with my videos.
349
« on: September 27, 2022, 15:00 »
In my case, 0 out of 31 illustrations were selected - I could have saved myself the time of considering whether to submit all or just some for the free collection.
Quite disappointing...
350
« on: September 15, 2022, 16:42 »
This is completely nuts... 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
