pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - qunamax

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20]
476
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock very slow today
« on: July 16, 2016, 03:33 »
Last two days reviews are like realtime, a minute after the upload files are reviewed. Meanwhile IS is taking a month to review...

477
Off Topic / Re: snipers shoot dead police officers in Dallas
« on: July 14, 2016, 09:51 »
When two countries (or any other entities or sides) are at war and you are being fired on, you return fire, you don't care if the guy on the other side has a family, he didn't care if you had. You don't stand and watch or shout "that's wrong!"

I really can't understand a logic where a group of people can fire at other group of people and only one of those groups is entitled to return fire. Police just got a little taste of what they've been doing for a long time and everyone should feel for them? We should be civilized now? Let's talk now, not shoot? Yeah right, tell that to innocent people killed by police, they too have families.

If the police didn't want to get sniped they shouldn't have killed innocent people for fun. Simple as that. If you are policeman  and you are innocent and you judge the killing of innocent people, well, step out and say it: "Something in police doesn't work let do something about it" - if you say nothing you as well might be a murderer.   

So something in police doesn't work, so therefore, let's arm all civilians and declare open war on cops? And while we are at it, let's arm ALL civilians with semi- and automatic weapons, so we can show all the innocent bystanders just who's boss. This war is just like a nuclear war...there are no winners. Everybody dies. Is that what should happen? No. What should happen is EVERYBODY puts down their guns and finds some other solutions to all their hate and ignorance. And even if one side tries to make changes, the other side digs in their heels and is not willing to compromise, kind of like when legislators say they want to put firmer gun control laws and regulations in place, the NRA and followers shout at the top of their lungs NO OUTLAWING OF GUNS. Until both sides are willing to compromise, nothing will change and the violence will continue.  :(

No it's not a solution to have a total war, but I just can't judge returning fire, sometimes you have to show a force, especially if you are fighting a mindless force that knows no other way.

478
Off Topic / Re: snipers shoot dead police officers in Dallas
« on: July 12, 2016, 13:52 »
When two countries (or any other entities or sides) are at war and you are being fired on, you return fire, you don't care if the guy on the other side has a family, he didn't care if you had. You don't stand and watch or shout "that's wrong!"

I really can't understand a logic where a group of people can fire at other group of people and only one of those groups is entitled to return fire. Police just got a little taste of what they've been doing for a long time and everyone should feel for them? We should be civilized now? Let's talk now, not shoot? Yeah right, tell that to innocent people killed by police, they too have families.

If the police didn't want to get sniped they shouldn't have killed innocent people for fun. Simple as that. If you are policeman  and you are innocent and you judge the killing of innocent people, well, step out and say it: "Something in police doesn't work let do something about it" - if you say nothing you as well might be a murderer.   

479
Off Topic / Re: snipers shoot dead police officers in Dallas
« on: July 08, 2016, 06:24 »
Well apparently not, since the youtube is full of videos of people shooting anything from pistols to large caliber sniper rifles at random things...   

480
Software / Re: affinity designer - photoshop alternative
« on: July 07, 2016, 09:47 »
Well that's a shame, it's supposed to be a complete replacement, ultimate one package solution for photographers and designers.

481
Software / Re: Xpiks - open source software for microstocker
« on: July 07, 2016, 09:37 »
Hi, really appreciate your work on software.
I have question about 123RF, just registered there with 3 photos accepted. Later I put some bunch of photos trough Xpiks and uploaded to Alamy, Fotolia and 123RF. Alamy and Fotolia got the photos just right over ftp, while photos sent to 123RF (connection test and everything else was green and OK) uploaded but were nowhere to be found on 123RF... Do you know what could have caused this?

482
Software / Re: affinity designer - photoshop alternative
« on: July 06, 2016, 04:41 »
For photographers the real bomb is the Affinity Photo which is not released yet (later this year they say), it's supposed to be like Lightroom and Photoshop alternative in one package.

483
New Sites - General / Re: Stockafe email
« on: June 25, 2016, 11:25 »
Yes but for some reason, I am getting some photos but none of the mentioned girl :D

484
iStockPhoto.com / Re: One month for photos to get approved
« on: June 21, 2016, 05:15 »
I had a publishing bug for the last batch, the save trick worked.

485
New Sites - General / Re: Stockafe email
« on: June 21, 2016, 04:36 »
Can you elaborate on that please, I can't replicate that to get to those photos? Thank you!

486
iStockPhoto.com / Re: One month for photos to get approved
« on: June 21, 2016, 04:25 »
Still at 21 days here, I'm new. One day for editorial.

487
New Sites - General / Re: Stockafe email
« on: June 20, 2016, 18:29 »
Well I figured I won't bother with low tier, at least for a year until I see how it's all going. One thing puzzles me and that's where did they get my email address anything that could tie my email with a stock photography are this forum and stock markets I joined...

488
New Sites - General / Stockafe email
« on: June 19, 2016, 09:29 »
Hi, I was wondering, today I got an email from Stockafe stating that some pros over there stumbled upon my photos and they decided to contact me to join them if I want.
Now since it looks pretty generic and spam and I just started out with stock it obvious that they didn't see my photos, but I was wondering if anyone else got this email and where could the address be leaking from...? I'm registered to IS, 123RF, FT, Alamy, 500px, DT and P5 but at the moment only got photos on 500px and IS.

489
Newbie Discussion / Re: Ranking Keywords on istock
« on: May 25, 2016, 03:02 »
As a newbie on iStock i find it quite buggy or something. Lots of phrases that one would think are usual for the stock are just not there, some of them I can add some I can't for no apparent reason and other times my keywords just disapear and sometimes reapear out of nowhere.
Some places names I can search and see other photos tagged with it, but for me it's not included and I can't even add it.
Some times I add some new phrases (which really should be already there given the number of photos and the stock nature of those keywords) and a few days later they can be added again...

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors