1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Why no mercy for contributors?
« on: Today at 10:55 »
depends on the "similar" case
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
General Stock Discussion / Re: Why no mercy for contributors?« on: Today at 10:55 »
depends on the "similar" case
2
Adobe Stock / Re: when do the free photo collection nominations happen?« on: May 29, 2024, 10:26 »Sure there is, uploading AI you select illustration or photos = ai-photosis only PHOTOS and not AI-Photos? 3
General Stock Discussion / Re: Transparent backgrounds-am I missing out?« on: May 28, 2024, 14:05 »
yes is worth but only if cut out by hand = clean
4
Adobe Stock / Re: when do the free photo collection nominations happen?« on: May 27, 2024, 12:47 »
is only PHOTOS and not AI-Photos?
5
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Apr'24 statements are in - How was your month?« on: May 19, 2024, 17:54 »
I am super happy i stopped uploading there, mostly all are 0.02 USD China FotoPress
6
Adobe Stock / Re: Custom License as low as $0.29 now?« on: May 06, 2024, 09:58 »
0.30 USD too. ByeBye minimum 0.33, welcome 0.10 USD soon, hello poverty as an artist
7
Adobe Stock / Re: Will there be an Adobe Stock 2023 contributor bonus program?« on: February 14, 2024, 23:47 »
any news here?
i have 2 weeks left 8
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock photo sales revenue only 1/20 of Adobe Stock's.« on: January 17, 2024, 08:28 »If you different portfolios how you can even compare them, I have exactly the same portfolios on AS and SS, for me SS is 3x the number of downloads of AS.SS 99% are only 0.10 USD per download, for me. For me SS would need to sell 100 times more then AS. But AS sells 100 times more then SS. My case.. AS wins clearly. 9
Adobe Stock / Re: Do Adobestock have more stringent moderators or rules on AI submitted content?« on: January 15, 2024, 04:23 »
be aware it is in the details
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mksbm6BgFQ&t 10
General Stock Discussion / Re: list of agencies that do or do not accept AI generated images« on: January 13, 2024, 05:46 »
AS
123rf indivstock 11
Adobe Stock / Re: Genuine illustrations marked as AI« on: January 10, 2024, 04:38 »I had the same problem. But it only affected 4 vector graphics that have been online for many years. Mat has ensured that the "AI generated" has now disappeared. I assume it is programmed: Fahrrad search is for BICYCLE only. Bicycle also searches for bicycle, bike, cycle. 12
Adobe Stock / Re: Genuine illustrations marked as AI« on: January 08, 2024, 08:59 »
Same case. But u have to report each image id. i do not want to check all these thousands. So i let it be.
14
General Stock Discussion / Re: adobe massive batch rejections? (actual photos + gen ai)« on: December 26, 2023, 16:40 »
-
15
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS just screwed up the site again« on: December 22, 2023, 13:38 »Sounds like even more good content from experienced producers will be going near exclusively to Adobe. Yes! My AdobeStock earnings per day are the same as SS per MONTH. lol insane! 16
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock: adult or discriminatory content allowed? how to mark a adult image?« on: December 22, 2023, 13:31 »
Okay. Yes i read this part.
No minor. Overweight man is adult and woman too. If AI-image, no model release = account ban? Overweight man = discrimination? Saw other images and videos after a quick search, online, so this should be okay. (?) Maybe i just skip these topics. Still not 100% clear. Try & error (account gone) is maybe too risky for me. There really needs to be a checkbox for things that you (I, and maybe everyone else) aren't sure about. 17
Adobe Stock / Adobe Stock: adult or discriminatory content allowed? how to mark a adult image?« on: December 22, 2023, 13:09 »
Because I'm worried about having the account blocked, I ask.
How can I mark sensitive content when uploading so that the AS employee doesn't block the account while image selection. So where's the checkbox for "adult content"? Don't see any... Other sites have a simple checkbox. Especially if Mat reads here, it would be great to get an answer. Examples: 1. overweight man in gym while biting in a hamburger (discriminatory, and everyone is so super sensitive these days) 2. naked woman in the shower, breasts visible (clearly adult content) 18
General Stock Discussion / Re: adobe massive batch rejections? (actual photos + gen ai)« on: December 15, 2023, 13:14 »So... Do you have an example, one or two rejected images? full size 19
DepositPhotos / Re: How is DP for sales? (photos & vids)« on: December 08, 2023, 06:51 »
is it still? you have to enter a title AND a different description too. Because this i once stopped uploading. super annoying to add one additional word to the description for each image. So it was not super easy to upload.
20
General Stock Discussion / Re: Keywording and meta data GPT« on: November 16, 2023, 10:07 »There is no code I used in GPT, I have just used the web setup interface and provided some custom instructions and documents.Documents? Thought it is text input only? Okay i will wait until it is possible for my account too.@korner83 21
General Stock Discussion / Re: Keywording and meta data GPT« on: November 16, 2023, 09:48 »To effectively generate titles and tags, this chat must be able to receive batches of 30-100 photos (in low resolution) and produce a list with the name of each file, title, description, and tags as an xls file. And all this must be done quickly. If you upload a "Iron Man" image it maybe uses the word "Marvel" or similar? Need to check everything after. Do not want my account blocked. Dangerous game 22
General Stock Discussion / Re: https://www.indivstock.com« on: November 16, 2023, 09:44 »
Easy to upload and overall fair. No complaints, typical low earner. Revenue maybe 1% compared to Adobe. Better than other low earners because there aren't constant "exciting news" making things worse. Pretty high annoying rejection rates. Generally recommended. But I still have the better older commission with 80% commission. It's now only 48%
23
General Stock Discussion / Re: Keywording and meta data GPT« on: November 16, 2023, 09:43 »
@korner83
can u publish your code you used on CHATGPT here? "Your access to custom GPTs isnt ready yet. Were rolling this feature out over the coming days. Check back soon." 24
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Unveils TRUST, its Best-in-Class Approach for Ethical AI« on: November 14, 2023, 18:00 »
SS == NO-TRUST-ZERO-FAIR-A-BIG-0.10USD-JOKE
25
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe AI content double standards« on: November 02, 2023, 13:24 »
can somebody explain why AI vector images are not allowed? Are these files not editable by the customer or what is the problem about? It`s like fake vector files? Or it does not matter for the customer? edit: I dont know how a vector file is working, so it is interesting whats going on here.
|
|