Graphic and web designer for 30 years. Stock Photography has spoiled me. I hate (most) clients and don't budge on pricing with the branding work and don't take the crap I used to. Ya get jaded over the years. Life is so much better now.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu
Quote from: silverek on April 20, 2013, 08:38
Lesson #1: Don't comment on something when you have no idea what the situation is. Also, one who posts only to be negative is one who is not happy with himself. This is a site to help others, not underhandedly cut them down. Hope that gives you a little insight and helps you to change.
Quote from: Leo on April 11, 2013, 18:58
I'm always a little self-conscious we are dominating the top page a little too much. The same would happen if anyone else brought their main forums into here.
At any time (if its Leaf's wish) we can take certain forums over to the www.symbiostock.com site. The site is not ready yet, but it could happen. Just keep me posted.
Quote from: flashon on March 16, 2013, 08:27
I had same thing happened to me in 2011. The repair cost then was $230 from Canon Factory Service Center (in US). It was not covered in warranty as it was considered as physical damage.
For eye-fi to work, you need to get a CF -> SD adapter, some claimed it not very reliable (at least it's not officially supported). I shoot Mark III now and the eye-fi works just fine (very short distance though).
The other option is Canon's $700 WFT (what?) unit.
Quote from: gostwyck on March 16, 2013, 01:42
Why shoot tethered? Wireless alternatives are just so cheap nowadays. I'm sure it'll be cheaper to go wireless rather than having your camera's socket repaired. You could even use a basic flash gun, mounted onto your hot-shoe, to trigger your strobes. One very successful microstocker I've shot with (back in 2007) used that method all the time.
PS: I've heard you can even get non-tethered electric telephones nowadays too. Who'd have thought it, eh?
Quote from: tab62 on March 16, 2013, 01:53
the wifi (Eye fi) works for me well...
Quote from: gostwyck on March 14, 2013, 01:40
If any of our MSG friends do get the opportunity to contribute to the survey then please ensure that, amongst their dissatisfactions, they highlight the despicable management attitude to contributors, as illustrated in the the treatment of SJLocke and others.

Quote from: shotupdave on February 25, 2013, 23:09Quote from: oxman on February 25, 2013, 20:57
As a follow up -- all images shot with my new Canon G15 were (standard) rejected by IS. They were shot in filtered natural light at 80 ISO with minimal post processing. They were just not sharp due to the lens quality and small sensor. Back to Best Buy it goes.
Good luck all you point-and-shoot hopefuls.
OX
...gemme DSLR and big sensors
I wonder if tbe quality is actually the reason. I would like to see a photo with an older 6.2mp cannon or nikon compared with the quality of the g15 and the other 4/3 cameras. Or are the inspectors just looking at the metadata and rejecting
Quote from: jatrax on February 24, 2013, 00:15
Take a look at Pentax K-01. APS-C sensor, interchangeable lenses, mirrorless. Fits in a coat pocket (not a shirt though) with the 40mm lens. I got mine for $319 body only. Same sensor as in Nikon D7000.
Quote from: Mantis on February 23, 2013, 23:45
I have been looking for a similar system but no luck yet. I have been judging point and shoots by going to http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samples and viewing full size images from various point and shoots. Everything I have looked at, including the Fuji Finepix 100, has too much noise and has a sharpness issue, at least in the samples posted on DP Review.
