|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - aeonf
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 27
151
« on: May 05, 2012, 04:46 »
Sean only made 750K last year thus missed the millionaire club...
Then who's the one reporting 900k income? Probably aeonf 
Holly crap I wish  A lame 16.5K for us
152
« on: May 04, 2012, 04:08 »
Holgs has groupies! wow Sometimes I think its a shame I am anonymous
153
« on: May 01, 2012, 18:40 »
Anyone planning to buy shares?
That all depends on the price...
154
« on: May 01, 2012, 18:40 »
I would try and help with the math but I am way to drunk for that now I do agree with the conclusion though, with out a doubt it makes perfect sense in opening your own shop with such a large port. I do doubt that it will hurt any of the big boys. One can not compete his 70K port with 10M+ port. Add to the fact that his photos are what Sean calls a "one trick poney"
155
« on: May 01, 2012, 14:31 »
^^^ your math is all wrong.
156
« on: May 01, 2012, 04:11 »
^^^ I have no plan of "accepting" it.
You can if you wish.
I won't let one bad month spoil my plans.
157
« on: May 01, 2012, 04:01 »
-32% from last month with only 410 sales as an IS exclusive with over 4K photos. 
158
« on: April 24, 2012, 03:23 »
does uploading to TS, go via IS?, anybody?
All photos you upload to IS will get to TS automatically (eventually).
159
« on: April 23, 2012, 16:37 »
Cheer up, i'm at -40% !!
Very derpressing.
160
« on: April 23, 2012, 05:18 »
That is correct, RPI is useful for business planning and forecasting. Of course what I want is a high total income. RPI helps me know where I'm heading and how to get there.
+1
161
« on: April 20, 2012, 16:23 »
162
« on: April 10, 2012, 16:20 »
Near zero downloads for us.
Quite depressing.
163
« on: April 04, 2012, 18:11 »
I must join the cummon crowds opinion here.
I still don't understand what are the fees involved.
What can't I get a strait answer listed in 1 table ?
if I have 100$ and wish to withdraw them from a local ATM in my local currency, how much local currency cash would I be able to withdraw ?
this might be a good solution for US people, and NOT the rest of the world. I don't mind paying (reasonable) fees but I sure like to know HOW MUCH fees I am paying in advance!
The bank rips me off, but at least I know how much (down to the last cent) + the fees are negotiable.
164
« on: April 03, 2012, 08:35 »
4FR: I must agree, even though such services are much easier to use then checks I still use checks because then at least I know exactly how much I pay.
I see no reason to stop using checks even with all the hassle involved.
165
« on: April 01, 2012, 12:05 »
How was your March ?
Mine was good.
A BME for both downloads and dollars. Over 2,500$ with 550 downloads.
About 4,000 photos.
166
« on: March 29, 2012, 14:33 »
Hi and welcome to the forum.
A few questions:
Are there fees when recieving funds from Istockphoto ?
Is it possible to withdraw cash from an ATM using this card in non US currency (outside of the US) ?
What are the exchange rates ?
What other fees are involved ?
167
« on: March 20, 2012, 15:07 »
It took 3 days here.
168
« on: March 20, 2012, 04:46 »
lagereek: Are you saying that the canon zoom L's (for example) aren't good enough for modern high MP cameras ?
Most already have a new and better MK II version.
169
« on: March 19, 2012, 03:50 »
Are you a aware that this is a 2009 thread ?
170
« on: March 11, 2012, 18:09 »
Im in on the first attemp! 
Now i can call you my colleagues.
And competitors.
171
« on: March 05, 2012, 18:52 »
I saw an article yesterday online and the photo in the article was credited to Thinkstock. Nothing else. 
Yep. Yahoo uses images credited to TS all the time. I never had an image used on the yahoo front page until my images were xferred to the PP. Now I see them there a lot. Woo yay.
Thank SS.
172
« on: March 03, 2012, 13:11 »
And the latest ACR does it even better.
173
« on: March 03, 2012, 10:35 »
I loved the clip Holgs!
174
« on: March 02, 2012, 16:51 »
I think the thing that bugs me is that they added things like picture styles, HDR, and other kiddie cam crap (OMG a RATE button) to a camera that was previously a more professional tool. Its like they are shifting markets for the 5D, and not in a good direction. How likely is it that someone who wants to be able to rate their images in camera will shell out $4299 for a 5D III with lens?
Regarding the rate button, I gather from dpreview's blurb that this is targeting pros who use Lightroom as the rating info is read by Lightroom. The idea is you make your selects and "maybes" on the camera and LR keeps that info
Don't pros use photoshop ?
175
« on: March 01, 2012, 10:10 »
^^ I would just call it a bad joke!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 27
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
