4351
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?
« on: March 25, 2015, 17:07 »
Rent a studio by the hour?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 4351
General Stock Discussion / Re: Studio Space?« on: March 25, 2015, 17:07 »
Rent a studio by the hour?
4352
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: Mass of "Distribution Subscription" sales yesterday« on: March 25, 2015, 10:51 »
Canstock is doing better for me lately mind you has done this before and gone down later.
4353
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime approval time 2 weeks and more« on: March 22, 2015, 14:13 »
Anyone familar with Londons Tube system will recognise that DTs estimated review time uses the same algorithm as the minutes to arrival board!
4354
PhotoDune / Re: Envato Photodune: what's the skinny?« on: March 22, 2015, 13:39 »
I had high hopes when I first started uploading here - if you don't need Releases straightforward and although the reviewers could be idiosyncratic I got a reasonable acceptance rate -and reasonable sales now I hardly get anything accepted, sales are still not awful but no growth as my portfolio is static. I wonder if anyone other than a Mstock star could get near to building a decent portfolio starting from now.
4355
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is FTP upload broken again?« on: March 22, 2015, 13:33 »
Uploading direct fine on Explorer couldn't get it to work on Chrome - as I only do small batches at a time will probably go this way.
4356
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is FTP upload broken again?« on: March 22, 2015, 02:00 »
11 out of 20 have just appeared one corrupted 8 still AWOL
4357
General - Top Sites / Re: iStock SEO email« on: March 21, 2015, 14:32 »
Do they accept Magic beans?
4358
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is FTP upload broken again?« on: March 21, 2015, 14:24 »
Having same problem :-(
4359
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Nice surprise! IS payment has arrived early« on: March 20, 2015, 17:23 »
Well done IS on this I'd like to think its a sign of things to come....... but not hopeful
4360
General - Top Sites / Re: iStock SEO email« on: March 20, 2015, 16:01 »
There's loads of free consultancy advice for them on this site. Do they really not see that their "advice" shows how woefully out of touch they are.
![]() 4361
General Stock Discussion / Re: Views to sales download ratio« on: March 20, 2015, 04:49 »
I wouldn't bother every site counts views differently - totally unreliable stat imho - also you will get lots more views of "sexy girl in underwear" than "Rotting Rubbish dump" whether anyone intends to buy or not
![]() 4362
Newbie Discussion / Re: Explanation of the Poll« on: March 19, 2015, 07:50 »
I thought it was a %age of when a baseline was set of SS at 100. Its only a rough guide and is very useful as such, my advice is don't try and over analyse it (like nearly all the Mstock "statistics" bandied around)
4363
General - Top Sites / Re: iStock SEO email« on: March 19, 2015, 02:11 »
I only read it briefly as it seems a total waste of effort but I didn't see anything that indicated an increase of SALES rather than views.
4364
General - Top Sites / Re: Exclusive on one site, no-exclusive on every stock site which is more lucrative?« on: March 16, 2015, 07:06 »
Every agency seems to define views differently I get vast numbers on Dreamstime and very few on fotolia - the opposite in sales (except a few more rather than vast!!) not that I give them any attention
4365
General Stock Discussion / Re: 80 Surprising Stock Photography Trends 2015 released« on: March 14, 2015, 15:55 »
The thing that surprises me is what of my stuff sells or otherwise if it didn't I guess I'd be richer
![]() 4366
Newbie Discussion / Re: How Much Should New Contributors Expect to Earn?« on: March 14, 2015, 04:14 »
The model assumes the newbie is a relatively novice photographer - someone selling 1k images a month from a standing start is either a very experienced photographer or amazingly talented.
4367
General Stock Discussion / Re: 80 Surprising Stock Photography Trends 2015 released« on: March 14, 2015, 02:28 »
No surprises as far as I can tell
4368
General Stock Discussion / Re: What sells, and what doesn't« on: March 13, 2015, 18:15 »
whoops double post
4369
General Stock Discussion / Re: What sells, and what doesn't« on: March 13, 2015, 18:07 »
I think "opportunist" rather than random may be a better way of putting it. I usually go out with some shots in mind but some of my best sellers have been things I've seen when planning to take something else. Maybe I don't make as much as those that are more single minded but I still enjoy taking pictures
![]() 4370
Newbie Discussion / Re: How Much Should New Contributors Expect to Earn?« on: March 13, 2015, 03:00 »
I think a reasonable estimate might be those images go on earning an average 2 years - to take account of new image novelty and decline making 24c an hour? Of course that money doesn't pay the bills now.
If you didn't improve it would take about 3 1/2 years to get to $10 an hour I think it would be foolish to rely on this income stream to pay for anything essential for the first three years at least. 4372
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP for Feb has started« on: March 06, 2015, 02:21 »
Any one surprised this isn't happening on schedule?
![]() 4373
DepositPhotos / FTP problems« on: March 05, 2015, 05:20 »
Any one else experiencing non appearance of files loaded via ftp?
![]() Thanks 4374
iStockPhoto.com / Re: How Are Your iStock Sales?« on: February 26, 2015, 03:21 »
Not really why shouldn't people want to know what the information provided is to be used for - if its to be resold it may have a value
4375
Shutterstock.com / Re: I think we need a WELL DESERVED RAISE this year...« on: February 25, 2015, 14:39 »![]() "compared to slave labor or child labor in india this is worst because the slave and child do not have to pay for their equipment ." Really??? I actually find that comment rather offensive |
Submit Your Vote
|