MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sadstock

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24
451
U.S. Post office used the wrong Statue of Liberty image on a new stamp, blames a "stock photography service".   ::)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/us/15stamp.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13101814

And that had to be an editorial image since the Las Vegas one should be under copyright.  Does the post office qualify as commercial?   3 billion stamps should be one hell of an EL.

452
iStockPhoto.com / Re: What a MISTAKE !!!!
« on: April 13, 2011, 11:15 »
I doubt there will be a sale as there is nothing left to sell.  H&F basically sold Getty last fall.  They could not find a buyer or pull off an IPO so "Hellman & Friedman is paying itself $500 million after borrowing $1.3 billion for portfolio company Getty Images."
http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2010/11/03/short-memories-finance-private-equity-payouts-2/]

Credit to jsnover for posting this originally.
http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/photos-from-gettyimages-direct-to-thinkstock-ouch/msg194494/#msg194494

So if I'm reading this correctly, H&F borrowed $1.3 billion backed by Getty's assets, which would show up on the Getty balance sheet making it too ugly to pull off an IPO or sell. 

Now Getty needs as much cash flow as it can get to pay off the bonds, so it decides we are unsustainable.  Getty's income before interest has to be way less then $1.3 billion per year, so they will really struggle for a number of years to pay this off.  If they can't, the bond holders take the company, but H&F keeps the $500 million.

http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/entire-threads-disappearing/msg195508/#msg195508

453
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Vector Vetta rebellion
« on: April 12, 2011, 09:25 »
Still, I was surprised that he removed the post.  It was sincere and informative.  Dave stated he removed the post because he just needed to move on.

------------------------------------
Sounds to me like either he's saying its hopeless that Istock will not change, or he's afraid of what Istock will do to him for speaking his mind.  Either way its bad for all. 

454
Did I wake up on the dumb side of bed again?

Just got this newsletter from Istock about what editorial images are selling.  One of the sections of what's selling is "Global Coverage: There's a lot going on these days the world is a busy place. This leaves online and print publishers hungry for images that can help deliver context and tell stories."

One of the images in that section of the newsletter is picture of a protest/calibration from Egypt.  Following the link to a lightbox, the first three images are protest type images.  

Is this not news and therefore not permitted?  

Edited to ad that I've not been following any discussions of what is "editorial" at Istock, so maybe they've changed their perspective?

455
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Entire threads disappearing?
« on: April 10, 2011, 16:43 »
Seems to me H&F basically sold Getty last fall.  They could not find a buyer or pull off an IPO so "Hellman & Friedman is paying itself $500 million after borrowing $1.3 billion for portfolio company Getty Images."
http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2010/11/03/short-memories-finance-private-equity-payouts-2/]

Credit to jsnover for posting this originally.
http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/photos-from-gettyimages-direct-to-thinkstock-ouch/msg194494/#msg194494

So if I'm reading this correctly, H&F borrowed $1.3 billion backed by Getty's assets, which would show up on the Getty balance sheet making it too ugly to pull off an IPO or sell.  

Now Getty needs as much cash flow as it can get to pay off the bonds, so it decides we are unsustainable.  Getty's income before interest has to be way less then $1.3 billion per year, so they will really struggle for a number of years to pay this off.  If they can't, the bond holders take the company, but H&F keeps the $500 million

456
My question is why punish files with lots of keywords?  If its because Istock thinks more keywords = spam, then why not tell contributors to reduce keywords rather than punish those files secretly?

If there was a bump, maybe the bump comes from simply editing the metadata? 

457
Seems to have been a huge change since this morning. I've been regularly searching disinterestedly on 'horse'. This a.m. BST the first page was still more or less all Vetta with a few Agency sprinkled in.
Now it seems to be flamers, mostly not Vetta files.
Iin a search I am involved in, where there is only one Vetta file in the search, this a.m. I had 15+ new files in the top 200, now only 1 and 3 in the second 200. New files knocked well back now.
PLUS there is very little, if any, discernable 'boost' to exclusive files.

I see some changes on my standard search, maybe 20% change on the first page of 200. 

I think there is some type of slots system in action.  I can't see it much at the front, but at the very end are all of my files that have 1 sale, surrounded by other independents files who have 1 sale.  A couple of pages in from the bottom, are exclusives with 1 sale.  Just about everyone of the contributors are names that I recognize, people who are likely to have many different files in this particular search.  The files are all very relevant and would in fact be absolutely appropriate to be on the first page of results.  None of the files are new.  So if you have files in the front of the search, some of your less successful files in the results get sent to the back. 

Of course there is one senior admin contributor with a whole bunch of spamtastic Vetta's in the first page, completely inappropriate for the search results....  ::)

458
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Entire threads disappearing?
« on: April 08, 2011, 11:53 »
Not sure how long this link will function, but here is what Google had cached for this thread.

Thank you. Nothing is ever really deleted from the internet! Wonder why iStock would remove this thread, though?



--------------------------------------
Its part of JJRD's "different trust" campaign :-)  

http://www1.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=314342&page=14

459
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Entire threads disappearing?
« on: April 08, 2011, 11:20 »
Don't know how long google cache lasts, so I'm posting the lost thread here since its important - sorry for the long post

rogermexico

Comentado Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:34PM The complete details of all the coming changes are here. Please take the time to read this.

Here is a summary along with some frequently asked questions and answers.

How does the new royalty structure work?
Beginning in January 2011 all iStock contributors will qualify annually for their royalty rates. Your royalty rate will no longer be tied to your lifetime downloads total. Instead it will depend on how many credits were used downloading your files over the course of the previous year.

Redeemed Credits
There is now a Redeemed Credit total counter on the stats tab of your profile page. This represents the absolute value of credits used downloading your files.
-If you get a 1 credit extra small photo download, it goes up one.
-If you get a 20 credit extra large Exclusive photo download, it goes
up 20.
-If you get a 150 credit extended license download, it goes up 150.

There is a different total for each file type.

Currently the counter updates every week but we will have it updating daily soon.

How do Redeemed Credits determine royalties?
Every January we will announce royalty targets for the upcoming year. So in January 2011, we will announce the targets for 2012.

On January 1, 2012 your starting royalty for 2012 will be determined by whichever target your Redeemed Credit total meets.

Here are some examples using the 2011 targets posted here.

If you are an Exclusive photo contributor and have 42,000 redeemed photo credits at the end of 2010, your starting royalty rate on January 1, 2011 will be 35%. Remember: this is just your starting rate for the year.

If you are an Exclusive Vector contributor and have 76,000 redeemed video credits at the end of 2010, your starting royalty rate on January 1, 2011 will be 35%.

Why are the targets different for each file type?

The average download for each file type involves a different number of credits. The average illustration download involves almost twice as many credits as the average photo download. So to keep the
distribution of the different royalty levels more or less similar between different kinds of artists, the targets need to be different.

A Vector artist's Redeemed Credit total will grow faster than a photographer's who gets the same number of downloads. So while the targets for the Vector artist are higher, if the Vector artist and Photographer are similarly successful as far as the number of downloads they get, they will progress through the royalty targets at roughly the same rate.

Do Redeemed Credits carry over year to year?
No. Every year your Redeemed Credit total resets to zero and you begin accumulating them again.

Will my royalty ever go down during the course of a year?
No. You will be guaranteed that initial royalty for the full calendar year. Your initial royalty for the following year may go up or down depending which target you hit.

Can my royalty increase during the course of a year?
Yes. Each January your Redeemed Credit total resets to zero and you begin accumulating them again towards the next year's goals. If at some point during the year your total hits one of the higher targets,
you will immediately graduate to the higher level.

For example, if you start 2011 at 35%, and reach the 2012 Redeemed Credit level for 40% during course of 2011, you will immediately move to the higher rate.


Are the targets flexible?
The targets are based on our best projections for the upcoming year's growth and sales. If we discover that we are off in our projections as a year goes on - that the goals are too difficult and too many contributors are missing them - we will adjust them, yes.

* * *

The Agency Collection
The Agency Collection will be a new premium content collection at iStockphoto coming in late September / early October. It will contain content from select iStock contributors and photography agencies within the Getty Images family.

How does an iStock contributor get their photographs into Agency?
We will be inviting photographers to contribute with the aim of engaging people who create excellent images, can help us fill some of the gaps in our regionalized content, or are creating work that we feel will sell well a this price and at the different sites Agency will be available.

Where will the Agency Collection be available?
iStock, Getty Images, Jupiter and PunchStock.

What are the royalties?
For dowloads here at iStockphoto, the royalties will range from 22, 24, 26, 28 & 30%.

For downloads at all other sites the royalty will be 20%. Please note that at other sites Agency Collection will have a higher price point and a slightly modified license.

Why are the royalties at iStock different for this Agency Collection content?
Because the content itself is closer to 'traditional' RF prices, it comes with a modified royalty still higher than the standard Getty Images 20%.

What kind of photographs will be in this collection?
Content for Agency is being chosen specifically to address under-represented areas of the iStock colleciton, specifically regional content from different international markets.

Will content from outside of iStockphoto in the Agency Collection
be inspected?
Yes. Every photograph in the Agency Collection will go through our regular inspection process.

(Edited on 2010-09-10 18:39:25 by sylvanworks)

 


joyze

Comentado Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:57PM First I want to start by letting you all know that I have read all of the forum posts and spoken with many of you personally and I both feel and understand your frustrations and concerns. I want to reassure you that we have spent a long time working on this change, crunching numbers and looking at different options. At the end of the day, these changes were necessary to ensure long-term success for iStock over competitors from customers looking for the best, freshest stock content, and will keep the community thriving. I know many of you dont want to believe us and some of you say you have lost trust in us. Id like to ask that you at least give this new program a chance and give us the chance to win your trust back. The below aims to provide answers to your most pressing concerns and issues. If you still have further questions or require further clarification, please contact Contributor Relations.


1. Why should we endure these pay cuts when the company is so successful?

Please be assured that we have not taken any decisions or made any changes lightly. And while we know that they may be painful in the short term for some of you, our motivation in making them is the long-term continued success of the company and the community.
The changes have been decided on the basis of very thorough analysis and projections that indicate if we were to maintain the status quo, it may ultimately impede both the business and our community from prospering.

We believe strongly that this is the best path to iStocks continued market leadership internationally. If we do not plan and act for longevity, we could easily be caught at the back of the pack. We believe that would hurt everyone here much worse.


2. Why are you not grandfathering anyone in?

The new system is a fresh start and a level playing field. With that as the objective, it wouldnt make sense to grandfather anyone in. We understand this is unexpected and upsetting. You may be having trouble deciding what is best to do. Our contributor relations team is very good at helping people weigh pros and cons based on their unique situations. If you need more clarification, we encourage you to give them a call.


3. What are the new prices for Vetta?

Well change pricing on Sept. 27, and it will continue to be priced above Exclusive+, but below the pricing on Getty Images and below The Agency Collection. Designers have told us repeatedly, and it is underscored again in a Graphic Design USA survey just published that they want fresher, better and more exclusive content that is easy to find. And they are willing to pay for it. At the same time, when they want a simple, economical image, they want to be able to go to a one-stop-shop to find either

Small 30 credits
Medium 50 credits
Large 70 credits
XLarge 100 credits
XXLarge 125 credits
XXXLarge 150 credits


4. Why are illustrators' credits worth half of photographers' credits?

Vector targets are higher than photo targets strictly because the average Vector download uses more credits - roughly twice as much. For example, when you download a small photo, 3 credits are used, but we don't offer file size with Vectors so more credits will be redeemed when downloading a vector file on average. We separated the levels for each file type, as it was the most fair to the contributors. Please also know that we do have some great things planned for Vectors, however to keep our competitive advantage, we're not able to announce them at this time, but will very shortly.


5. Because Vectors have a different redeemed credits value than photos, are you separating Vector exclusives, Flash Exclusives and photo exclusives now?

Well be exploring that and will have an answer before the end of the year for everyone. But for right now, if youre exclusive in one, youre exclusive in all (Photo, Vector and Flash)


6. How will you increase sales?

As in years past, we will continue to invest heavily in our marketing and business growth initiatives. These investments certainly include the changes we are making to the site, beginning with F5 and continuing with new and improved search which will make it even easier for more customers to find and download more of your files. We have many marketing and business growth initiatives planned for next year, along with a new and improved search interface. Again, we can't release further details in order to keep our competitive edge.


7. We need more info on Agency Collection

We survey thousands of customers regularly and from their feedback we learn how we need to grow and expand to meet a broad spectrum of customer needs and ensure they buy from iStock. We know there are many current and prospective customers who purchase from the traditional stock agencies. At the same time, many iStock contributors have asked for a collection like this for their images. So the agency collection is being added to fill a need, not as a replacement. While this will be a small collection, it helps position us to provide a full suite of images in all price ranges to meet all of our clients needs.

The images in the agency collection will be treated in the same manner as any file uploaded to the site. They will go through the inspection process and be approved only if they meet the standards we have set for this collection. In search and Best Match the images will be weighted fairly and will not have a heavier weight than any other file. In other words, you won't find the entire agency collection at the front of every search. You will find some agency collection files scattered in with every search, just the same as you see now for Vetta and exclusive plus files.

This collection will give you the opportunity to compete with the best stock houses in the world, on their turf and on your own.


If you'd like to discuss these questions, please post here

(Edited on 2010-09-15 14:58:29 by joyze)

 


joyze

Comentado Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:06PM
We've compiled some more questions that have been asked and answered them below:


1. When are "redeemed credits" going to be fully integrated into stats charts, royalty download pages, etc.

Full integration is expected as we get closer to the implementation of the new royalty levels. Currently, each business day redeemed credit totals are updated for each contributor and available in your stats tab.

2. Why are certain "exclusives" part of Vetta, yet they can sell the same content on other non-Getty sites

The exclusive collection contains photos and illustrations by contributors whose royalty-free stock is only available from iStockphoto and the Getty Images family of companies and their distribution partners. With the Hulton Archive collection, these images may be found elsewhere because Getty is also distributing them through their distribution partners.
As well, there was an issue where a contributor was distributing their images both through iStock and other channels. This is not permitted under our Exclusivity terms and once it was brought to our attention it was handled. When contributors are exclusive with iStock, they may not sell their images through any other channel unless it is a program created through iStock directly. If you find further cases like this one, we ask that you contact us at [email protected] and well investigate the matter and handle it appropriately.

3. Why is it taking so long to do all the F5 fixes for things that were broken (EL page, my_uploads, etc.)

Our development schedule is jam-packed with new features and improvements to existing functionality. We have been focused on optimizing the site for improved customer experience, and now that we've made such a gigantic stride forward in that area, we're turning our focus back on the contributors. We've therefore pushed a whole raft of fixes to the top of our TO Do list. We have front end and back end fixes. Sometimes in order to make the front end fix work we need to focus on the back end first. This is the case for some of these broken features. But, I want to reassure you that we are working on them and will have them out to you as quickly as possible. You will see these fixes coming online during our weekly releases over the next few months.

4. How does the "Agency" payment agreement work with outside content - do their sales affect our target levels

The Agency folks that are not contributors to iStock do not collect Redeemed credits, they are paid on a flat percentage rate.


5. Are "Agency" "inspections" causing the exclusive queue to go to almost a week? If not, why is the queue so long?

The Agency files have very little impact on the exclusive queue. Were aware of the backlog and the inspection team is on a blitz to kick the Q down and it should be back under control soon.

(Edited on 2010-09-28 16:07:02 by joyze)

 

460
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Entire threads disappearing?
« on: April 08, 2011, 11:18 »
Assuming this is not yet another bug, this is really pathetic and it makes me sick.  I can see disappearing a thread about a contributor who has issues/problems with an account, but to disappear a thread of only Istock admin postings laying out what the process/policies/future looks like is just wrong and an admission of just how out of control things really are. 

Is there any way to trust an organization that disappears official policy? 

Somebody should call them on this.

461
General Stock Discussion / Re: A list of partner programs
« on: April 07, 2011, 21:21 »
Wow, great list - thanks for all the work.  I think I should make this topic sticky so it doesn't get lost.  Can I add this info to the wiki?


----------------------------

Thanks for making it a sticky, hope its helpful to people.  Feel free to add it to the wiki as well. 

The BS secrecy that most of the micros wrap their partner programs in pisses me off, so let's share it around.  Honestly does anybody think that if a micro wanted to duplicate DT or FT's partner program it would take them more than a day to find all of them?  Really?  All it does is make it hard for contributors to know where their images are and if they are being paid correctly. 

462
General Stock Discussion / Re: A list of partner programs
« on: April 06, 2011, 22:02 »
Glad people like it.  I found the process of assembling the list to be very useful.  Thanks all for the updates which I've added in.  Please let me know if I missed anything.  

For some reason I though you could opt out of Fotosearch, but seems not to be the case.

463
General Stock Discussion / A list of partner programs
« on: April 06, 2011, 17:08 »
In the short time that Ive been reading the MSG Ive noticed that people are constantly asking who is this company, how did they get my images and are they legit?  Generally it turns out to be a partner of some sort, but there is no central list of partners, so I thought Id start one. 

Im going to classify as a partner anyone that has a relationship with a microstock company that results in that company appearing to have our images for sale or use.     

Ive listed the micros that Ive been following, and the partners that Ive identified (or have been suggested/claimed to be a partner), with a link to a confirmation or at least a discussion of the partner and its relationships to one of the micros.  Im not following everyone and Im sure Ive missed lots of stuff, so Id welcome your input.

1-27-13 - Sorry not to update sooner, but I'm no longer able to post process/upload stock (wrist problems) so I don't come here all that often.  Given that its 10 months since my last update and I could only find 2 new items to add, not sure that I'll make any more updates to this list. 
      
123RF
Opt out possible?  Yes - http://www.microstockgroup.com/123royaltyfree-com/opting-out-of-api-partner-sales/
Feebdesign/stockphoto.feebdesign.com - Per nata_rass in post #66 of this thread
Hemistock.com - Per nata_rass in post #66 of this thread
Glowimages.com - Per Noedelhap in post #119 of this thread. see http://www.glowimages.com/home-stock-photography-microstock/index.html
Inmagine.com - Owns 123RF - Reply #20 below by Newsfocus1
Magnetqueen - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/magnetqueen-anyone-heard-of-it-legit/
Moodboard - http://www.microstockgroup.com/123royaltyfree-com/latest-newsletter-from-123rf/
Notforzombies - http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/not-for-zombies/
Ooopic.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/ooopic-com-tuke135-partner-site/
Panthermedia - http://www.microstockgroup.com/panthermedia-net/panthermedia-relaunch-(press-release)/msg232511/
Photogenic - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-reseller-api/
Pinterest* - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/game-over-pinterest-pirates-gets-100-million-$-!/msg256132/
profimedia.cz - per jsnover in post #129 of this thread.Reflexstock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/reflex-stock/
Qianwenhua.com/ Front Foto - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/is-this-a-partner-or-what
Stocklib by Epictura - Per my post #46 in this thread
Stockpodium - http://www.microstockgroup.com/123royaltyfree-com/problem-with-(new)-123rf-partner/
Zcool - http://www.123rf.com/blog/blog.php?idblog=b1000237&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Pixmac - Terminated Jan 27, 2011 - http://www.microstockgroup.com/123royaltyfree-com/123rf-serves-termination-notice-to-pixmac/
Pond5 - ended by early February, 2013 - http://www.microstockgroup.com/pond5/question-17280/msg296812/#msg296812

Bigstock
Opt out possible?  yes
Caf Press - https://www.bigstockphoto.com/partners/
Crystalgraphics.com - http://www.bigstockphoto.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4559&p=20567&hilit=crystalgraphics.com#p20567
Emma - https://www.bigstockphoto.com/partners/
Flash Templates - http://www.microstockgroup.com/bigstock-com/87-cent-commission/
Frontfoto -  http://image.qianwenhua.com/ 
Media bakery/ colossus - still active? - http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/abt93850-0-asc-0.html
Pinterest* - http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/pinterest-finding-a-loophole/msg249065/
PixelLogo - http://www.microstockgroup.com/bigstock-com/87-cent-commission/

Pixmac canceled at some point

Canstockphoto
Opt out possible?  ???
Fotosearch - Owns Canstock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/canstockphoto-com/canstock-portfolio-on-fotosearch/
Gograph.com Per luissantos84 in post #98 of this thread
Reflexstock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/reflex-stock/
Value Stock Images - owned by Fotosearch, confirmed by sitemail

DepositPhotos
Opt out possible?  Yes
clashot.com - Owned by Depositphotos.  Editorial images only.  http://clashot.com/manual.html
ibudgetphoto.com - DT watermarked images on site, file number prefix "DRMT"
Pixmac - per zager in post 28 of this thread.
Pond5 - Via Pixmac

Dreamstime
Opt out possible?  Yes
Boom Bucket Mobile - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_7572
Brightqube - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_8611
Eapoo.com - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_33700
Fotobanka Imagio - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_22756
I22 - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_9615
ImageClick - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_9615
Imagetrail - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_8611
Morguefile - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_24427
MySpace - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_11224
Publicdomainpictures - cclapper Post 29 of this thread
Phototimes.ru - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_26444
Picfindr - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_8611
Picturesandbox - http ://www.dreamstime.com/thread_8611
Pinterest* - http://blog.dreamstime.com/2012/04/26/pinterest-and-stock-photography_art37491
http://www.microstockgroup.com/dreamstime-com/dreamstime-and-pinterest/
Stockfreeimages.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-news/stockfreeimages-com/
Supprint.com - http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_20592
timelineimages.com - http://www.dreamstime.com/forumm_31550_pg1
Pixmac Terminated Jan 17, 2011 http://www.dreamstime.com/thread_25551

Featurepics
Opt out possible?  ???
nunukphotos.com - Per dirkr in post #65 of this thread

Fotolia
Opt out possible?  No
1&1 - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/news-lcn-com-and-fotolia-form-strategic-partnership/
1photoshop.fr - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/more-Fotolia-partners/
AgeFotostock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Apimages.com - http://www.apimages.com/MicrostockRFabout.aspx
Artforweb - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Artiloo - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/more-Fotolia-partners/
Bilderking - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Efototapeten.de - per http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/fotolia-partner-sales/
EasyFototock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Everystockphoto - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/fotolia-and-everystockphoto-com/
Fotky foto fotobanka - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/fotolia's-partner/
Foto.artgeist - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Fotonity - http://us.fotolia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=15570
Imagesformyweb - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/more-Fotolia-partners/
Imagetrail - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
IML Image Group Ltd - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Inkshuffle - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/inkshuffle-com/
Kitgrafik - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
LCN Hosting - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/news/fotolia/fotolia-_lcn-_partnership-.html
Microsoft Office - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/worse-than-istock-for-me/msg189974/#msg189974
Moodboard - http://www.stockphototalk.com/the_stock_photo_industry_/2008/03/fotolia-moodboa.html
New Era Walls by HP - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/new-era-walls-by-hp
Oligopix - Per my post #47 in this thread
Okaypix - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Onlydoo - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Parangaimages.com - Per Jwolf in post #126 of this thread.
Photog.snaparazzi.eu - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Photos.codes-sources - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Photoxpress - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Picturevillage - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/picture-village/
Pingg - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/news-fotolia-announces-partnership-with-pingg-com/
Pixers.pl - per my post #45 in this thread
Pixersize.com - Per click_click in post #139 of this thread
Popgamut.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/new-era-walls-by-hp
Purebudget.com - per ThomasAmby post #56 of this thread
Scake - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/skace-com-another-fotolia-affiliate-probably/
Scanpix - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Sisustus.net - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/more-Fotolia-partners/
SlideRocket - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/news/fotolia/fotolia-_sliderocket-_partners.html
Snaparazzi - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/on_the_net/cool_tools/snaparazzi_fotolia_api.html
TemplateMonster - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/press/release/fotolia-_templatemonster-_stoc.html
Tuweimei - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/Fotolia-partners/
Value Stock Images - Per my post #44 in this thread
Visible Spectrum - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/2011/12/15/partner-feature-visible-spectrum/?utm_source=email_Fotolia&utm_medium=email_loyalty&utm_campaign=2011-12-21_3619US
Visionbedding.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/visionbedding-com/
VisualBee - http://blog.fotolia.com/us/2011/09/08/visualbee-fotolia%e2%80%99s-newest-api-partner/
Wallmonkeys.com per click_click in post #94 of this thread
Web-set.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/more-Fotolia-partners/
Xycod - http://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/partner-deal-with-xycod/

Pixmac - terminated 12/31/10  - per zager in post 28 of this thread.
Moo - terminated between 4/6/11 and 1/4/12 - the link that listed them as a partner no longer works.  http://blog.fotolia.com/us/news/fotolia/fotolia-partners-moo-.html

Graphicleftovers
Opt out possible? 

Istock
Opt out possible? - It is messy. - independent contributors can no longer opt out.  Exclusives can opt out of the "partner program", but not from having their content moved to a "similar or higher priced collection"
- http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=333754&page=1   
Avery - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=77709
bumperstickers.biz Istock contributors content on Getty via Zazzle - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/'bumper-stickers'/
Campaigner - http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Together-Campaigner-and-iStockphoto-Help-Email-Marketers-Get-the-Picture-NASDAQ-JCOM-1407827.htm
Fedex office - http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-news/istock-pitney-bowes-and-fedex-kinkos/?wap2
Freepik.com Per post #63, free content managed by Stock.xchng which is owned by Getty
Getty - I've not followed very closely so not sure I could give a good summery/links
Getty Images/Motion (exclusive content) - http://www.microstockgroup.com/members-only-discussion/istock-video-exclusive-path-to-getty-imagesmotion-question/
Jupiterimages - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=88663/
Microsoft - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=49139
Photos.com - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=88663/
Pinterest* - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=351633&page=1
Staples - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=74811
Stock.xchng   Per post #63, while site has free content, search results also return Istock content.  Site is part of Getty. 
Thinkstock - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=171201
Wallartcanvasprints.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/www-wallartcanvasprints-com-istock-partner/msg223098/#msg223098
Wallartsuperstore.com They have Istock watermarked images, but only a handful of images overall, so may not be an authorized Istock partner.

Removing Microsoft - http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=351633&page=1
      
PantherMedia
Opt out possible?   Yes - http://anbieter.panthermedia.net/pm/mediarights
Massive list of Partners - http://www.panthermedia.net/index.php?page=cms%2Fpages%2Fdisplay2.php&cms_id=196&select_language=en
Glowimages.com - Per Noedelhap in post #119 of this thread. see http://www.glowimages.com/home-stock-photography-microstock/index.html
Reflexstock.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/reflex-stock/

Photodune
Opt out possible?  ???
Pinterest - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/game-over-pinterest-pirates-gets-100-million-$-!/msg255751/

Pond5
Opt out possible?  ???
Depositphoto - Via Pixmac - http://www.microstockgroup.com/pond5/question-17280/msg335500/#msg335500
FeaturePics - http://www.microstockgroup.com/pond5/question-17280/msg335500/#msg335500
Pixmac - Aquired by Pond5 http://help.pond5.com/customer/portal/articles/1020009
Yaymicro - http://www.microstockgroup.com/pond5/question-17280/msg335500/#msg335500
Ibudgetphoto.com - has images with Pixmac watermark

Shutterstock
Opt out possible?  Yes
Bigstock - dont know exactly what to call the relationship.  http://www.bigstockphoto.com/blog/theupload/2011/01/the-bridge-to-bigstock/

SignElements (formerly Isignstock)
Ingram - owns SignElements per Lotti in post #128 of this thread.

Stockfresh
No partner programs - Per pseudonymous in post #56 of this thread.
Pinterest* - http://www.microstockgroup.com/image-sleuth/game-over-pinterest-pirates-gets-100-million-$-!/msg255751/

Veer
Opt out possible?  No
List of some of their partner programs - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Agefotostock/Kalium/Potassium - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-portfolio-in-agefotosotck/msg273300/#msg273300
AIC.com -  Per Veer October 2011 Newsletter
Amana - Veer September 2011 Newsletter
Click Photo - Veer July 2011 Newsletter
Fotochannels.com -  http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Ibudgetphoto.com - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Imagedirekt.de - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/new-veer-partner-imagedirekt-de
India Pictures - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
LatinStock Brazil - Veer September 2011 Newsletter
Matton Images - per http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/is-matton-images-a-veer-partner/
Media Bakery - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-partnered-with-media-bakery-copyright-info-has-been-stripped-and-replaced/
Photogenica - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-reseller-api/
Pocketstock.com.mx - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Pocketstock.com - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Profilephotolibrary.com - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Profimedia.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/your-veer-portfolio-on-alamy/msg255754/#msg255754
Snapfish - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-reseller-api/
Top Photo -  http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Veerchina.com - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Visual Israel - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Visualphotos.com - Veer November 2011 Newsletter
VMI - http://www.veer.com/more/contributor/faq/royalties-payments/who-are-all-the-api-partners/
Alamy Added then removed mid May 2012 to mid June 2012 -  http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/your-veer-portfolio-on-alamy/msg260020/

YayMicro
Opt out possible? 
Alamy - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/yay-distribution-deal-with-alamy/
Better Photo! - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/yaymicro-twitter-news/
Datacraft - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/more-api's/msg279904/#msg279904
Ibudgetphoto.com - Yaymicro watermarked images on the site.
Photoambry - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/editorial-as-rf-on-partner-sites/
Photokore - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/more-api's/msg279904/#msg279904
Photogenica Poland - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/yaymicro-twitter-news/
Photogenica Russia - http://www.microstockgroup.com/yaymicro/yaymicro-twitter-news/
Pixmac - per zager in post 28 of this thread.
Visualphotos.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/veer-marketplace/veer-partners-visual-photos/

Zoonar
Opt out possible?  Yes
Age/THP
- http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/
Age Fotostock- http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-partners-acceptance/msg276771/#msg276771
Alamy
- http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/
APIS - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/earnings-on-zoonar/
DDP Images
- http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/
DHJV - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/
Fotofinder
- http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/
http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-partners-acceptance/msg276771/#msg276771[/url]
Jupiterimages - http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-news/photolibrary-sold-to-getty/msg0/?topicseen#new
http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/photolibrary-is-closing/
Photos.com - http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-news/photolibrary-sold-to-getty/msg0/?topicseen#new
Picturemaxx - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-now-offers-photolibrary-as-partner/   
Thinkstock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/microstock-news/photolibrary-sold-to-getty/msg0/?topicseen#new

Removed
Mauritius Images Best Price Stock - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-partners-acceptance/msg276771/#msg276771
Photolibrary - http://www.microstockgroup.com/new-sites-general/zoonar-partners-acceptance/msg276771/#msg276771            

* Site either has link to pin image on Pinterest or has indicated Pinterest is some type of partner and they will not pursue removal of images from Pinterest.

I dont know what to do with the following               
photooo.net - www.photooo.net            
http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/who-are-they-www-photooo-net/
Allfreelogo.com - http://www.allfreelogo.com - claims to be part of Dreamstime - http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/a-list-of-partner-programs/msg194889/#msg194889
Webstockpro.com
Unlistedimages.com

---------------------------------------------------------

5/19/11 - added Inkshuffle
6/10/11 - added Pixmac to DepositPhotos and YayMicro
6/10/11 - added Publicdomainpictures to Dreamstime
6/17/11 - added Value Stock Images to Fotolia
6/17/11 - added Pixers.pl to Fotolia
6/17/11 - added Oligopix to Fotolia
6/17/11 - added Stocklib by Epictura to 123RF
6/17/11 - added Webstockpro to the unknown list
6/17/11 - added Unlistedimages to the unknown list
6/17/11 - added Reflexstock to the unknown list
6/19/11 - added Media Bakery to Veer
6/19/11 - added Reflexstock to Canstockphoto
6/19/11 - added Reflexstock to 123RF
7/23/11 - updated Stockfresh to indicate no partner programs
7/23/11 - added Purebudget.com to Fotolia
7/23/11 - added Visionbedding.com to Fotolia
8/12/11 - added Freepik.com to Istock
8/12/11 - added Stock.xchng to Istock
8/12/11 - updated Photolibrary status on Zoonar
8/12/11 - added Reflexstock to Panthermedia
9/7/11 - updated Istock to reflect inability of independents to opt out of partner programs
9/7/11 - added Getty Images/Motion to Istock
9/7/11 - added Xycod to Fotolia
9/7/11 - added Nunukphotos.com to Featurepics
9/7/11 - added Feebdesign/stockphoto.feebdesign.com to 123RF
9/7/11 - added Hemistock.com to 123RF
9/7/11 - added Ooopic.com to 123RF
9/7/11 - added Value Stock Images to Canstockphoto
9/7/11 - added Photoambry to Yaymicro
9/26/11 - added Thinkstock to Zoonar
9/26/11 - added Photos.com to Zoonar
9/26/11 - added Jupiterimages to Zoonar
10/1/11 - added Better Photo! to YayMicro
10/1/11 - added Photogenica Poland to YayMicro
10/1/11 - added Photogenica Russia to YayMicro
10/12/11 - added Wallartcanvasprints.com to Istock
11/4/11 - added Efototapeten.de to Fotolia
11/4/11 - added AIC to Veer
11/4/11 - added Amana to Veer
11/4/11 - added Click Photo to Veer
11/4/11 - added LatinStock Brazil to Veer
11/4/11 - added Matton Images to Veer
11/26/11 - added Visual Photos to Veer
11/26/11 - added Visual Photos to Yaymicro
12/16/11 - added Panthermedia to 123RF
12/16/11 - added Crystalgraphics to Bigstock
12/20/11 - added PocketStock to Veer
12/20/11 - added Top Photo to Veer
12/20/11 - added Visual Israel to Veer
12/20/11 - added VMI to Veer
1/3/12 - added Visible Spectrum to Fotolia
1/3/12 - added VisualBee to Fotolia
1/21/12 - added Popgamut.com to Fotolia
1/21/12 - added New Era Walls by HP to Fotolia
1/21/12 - added Imagedirekt.de to Veer
1/21/12 - removed Moo from Fotolia
4/24/12 added Wallmonkeys to Fotolia
4/24/12 added Gograph to Canstockphoto
4/24/12 added Wallartsuperstore to Istock
4/24/12 added Stockfreeimages to Dreamstime
5/30/12 added Alamy to Veer
5/30/12 added India Pictures to Veer
5/30/12 added Profimedia to Veer
5/30/12 added Profimedia to Unknown
5/30/12 added Pocketstock.com to Unknown
5/30/12 updated existing entry for Pocketstock.com.mx to reflect full name
7-27-12 added Pinterest to 123RF
7-27-12 added Pinterest to Bigstock
7-27-12 added Pinterest to Dreamstime
7-27-12 added Pinterest to Photodune
7-27-12 added Pinterest to Stockfresh
7-27-12 added Pinterest to Istockphoto
7-27-12 added Zcool to 123RF
7-27-12 added timelineimages.com  to Dreamstime
7-27-12 added bumperstickers.biz to Istockphoto
7-27-12 Removed Alamy from Veer
11-16-12 - Added Cafe Press to Big Stock
11-16-12 - Added Emma to Big Stock
11-16-12 - Added Alamy to Yaymicro
11-16-12 - Added Datacraft to Yaymicro
11-16-12 - Added Photokore to Yaymicro
11-16-12 - Added Age Fotostock to Zoonar
11-16-12 - Added Agefotostock/Kalium/Potassium to Veer
11-16-12 - Removed Mauritius Images from Zoonar
11-16-12 - Removed Photolibrary  from Zoonar
3-6-13 - Added Glowimages.com to 123RF
3-6-13 - Added Profimedia.cz to 123RF
3-6-13 - Added Clashot.com to Depositphotos
3-6-13 - Added Ibudgetphoto.com to Depositphotos
3-6-13 - Added Pond5 to Depositphotos
3-6-13 - Added Eapoo.com to Dreamstime
3-6-13 - Added Apimages.com to Fotolia
3-6-13 - Added Parangaimages.com to Fotolia
3-6-13 - Added Glowimages.com to Panthermedia
3-6-13 - Added Depositphoto to Pond5
3-6-13 - Added Pixmac to Pond5
3-6-13 - Added Yaymicro to Pond5
3-6-13 - Added Ibudgetphoto.com to Pond5
3-6-13 - Added Ingram to SignElements
3-6-13 - Added Fotochannels.com to Veer
3-6-13 - Added Ibudgetphoto.com to Veer
3-6-13 - Added Pocketstock.com to Veer
3-6-13 - Added Profilephotolibrary.com to Veer
3-6-13 - Added Veerchina.com to Veer
3-6-13 - Added Ibudgetphoto.com to Yaymicro
3-6-13 - Removed Pond5 from 123RF
3-6-13 - Removed Profimedia.cz from unknown
3-6-13 - Removed Pocketstock.com from unknown
1-27-14 added Pixersize to Fotolia
1-27-14 - added FeaturePics to Pond5


464
Could a greasemonkey script be used to enable buyers to exclude v/agency ?

Unfortunately with the new JavaScript/Ajax stuff, I don't see anyway to do a filter.  I could hide them, but then you'd just get empty pages of nothing.

---------------------------------------
If the search ever gets back to something close to rational, I bet there would be a lot of interest from buyers in being able to hide Vetta and Agency, even if it just leaves an empty space.  I imagine it would save buyers some time and dashed hopes when looking for the perfect image only to find it out of their price range cause they did not check out the camera first. 

However my guess is Istock would not be too happy if you created something like that.   :)

465
I'm not seeing the vetta agency images at the beginning, a search for "business" gets the first vetta/agency image at #26 while out of the first 200 results I only see 3 (2 agency and 1 vetta).  Seems pretty good for me since I have 0 agency and only 3 vetta.

-----------------------------------------------------
I think your slider is to the right.  Set it to the middle and check again.  Amazingly with slider to the middle I see a Yuri image on the second page.  Given the V&A bias this shows just how much demand that image has.  (or he's getting a personal best match boost).

466
My standard best match reference search returns about 40,000 results of which I typically have 3 on the first page of 200, and 20 or more in the first 5 pages.  Today I had to get to page 40 before I found my first image.  Checking out the last page, its almost entirely my images.  Slider in the middle

467
I'm not sure why everyone is so surprised. The search is back to where it was just a month or so ago, with all the high priced stuff at the top.

Exactly, they did their little test and I'm sure their profit went way down so they reverted back.

-----------------------------------------

Its never been like this before, pure V&A. 

468
iStockPhoto.com / Re: strange observation regarding DLs!
« on: March 31, 2011, 17:10 »
I highly doubt they're actually going to block anyone's content from being viewed.  Why would they do that?  It wouldn't benefit anyone.

-------------------
Though I suggested it, I totally agree that its unlikely.  Should be easy to test with a few contributors around the globe. 

469
iStockPhoto.com / Re: strange observation regarding DLs!
« on: March 31, 2011, 12:57 »
I'm really hoping this is a bug.  If istock is gaming the search this way, it would be another new low as there is litterally nothing contributors could do within their portfolios to get their images to show up during off hours. 

If this is the case, I wonder if they only turn on/off independents and leave exclusives on all the time? 

470
Note that there is no claim by Kelly that they are now paying contributors $2 million a week.  I'd think that if that September prediction had come true that would have been one of the first things he said in the article.

471
The first thing I thought about this in reading the article is "Wow, he's put on a lot of weight!" 

http://press.istockphoto.com/pr/isp/default.aspx

472
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS hits rock bottom
« on: March 28, 2011, 21:09 »
I just got the lowest sale ever from iStock. Lower than the lowest rate in 2004.

Yup, it was for 8 effing cents.

Thanks for the insult, iS.


------------------------------
Don't worry!  Its all part of JJ's plan to reverse the tide and reach a new level of trust.  Doesn't this feel like a new level of trust to you?  He did promise it would be a different kind of trust.  

http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=314342&messageid=6107482#post6107482

473
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock F5 epic fail
« on: March 25, 2011, 13:22 »
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=308462&messageid=6019582

"While its true that we indeed plan, very thoroughly, future developments and improvements for the year ahead, it's also necessary that we are able to shift our development focus if the need arises. The past year has seen significant changes in iStock (F5 being one of many) in our effort to fortify our position in the marketplace and make things better for everyone, our contributors and customers alike."

Reading between the lines, it sounds to me like the development resources planned to be used to implement the logo program got sucked into F5 and other stuff, and rather than hire more staff, they delayed the logo program.

475
double post

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors