76
Software / Re: Mobile software for batch conversion from png to jpeg?
« on: January 09, 2024, 16:59 »
.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 76
Software / Re: Mobile software for batch conversion from png to jpeg?« on: January 09, 2024, 16:59 »
.
77
General Stock Discussion / Re: AI Generated images on Adobestock-Is it all down to the individual reviewing?« on: January 08, 2024, 09:27 »Did you read the bottom of the post?Did you read the topic you wrote for this post?: AI Generated images on Adobestock-Is it all down to the individual reviewing? 78
General Stock Discussion / Re: AI Generated images on Adobestock-Is it all down to the individual reviewing?« on: January 08, 2024, 09:19 »
Sorry, but all this is the case for more than 18 years with real photos. Produce good images, and this will not happen. I never complained myself about rejections for 18 years!
You should try doing something else then instead of AI generating, something where you have got a skill, or maybe spend time and work to get a skill. Btw, feel free to show the rejected images here. Usually, people don't do it. Guess why... 79
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time« on: January 08, 2024, 04:54 »
Sure, not that soon, but they already organise the(yr) future.
Adobe is obviously interested in all the money they will keep without the royalties given to human prompters uploading rapidly outdated images generated by rapidly evolving technology. Real photos will remain real photos. On the other hand, portfolios mixing images generated by AI and real photographs may pose a problem for them. Maybe some -enthusiastic, euphoric, and already constantly complaining immaturely- contributors should think about it. 80
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time« on: January 08, 2024, 04:23 »I find my weekly upload of 25 images are reviewed in 1 week - However the last 2 weeks every single image has been rejected due to quality which is ridiculous as they are no different in quality from my other 8000 approved images and I have never had more than 1 or 2 rejections each week historically......will see what happened this week! GOOD NEWS! thx Only consider that the time of human AI prompters maybe already finished. Adobe knows they will propose directly AI generation in the hands of their customers, with real time quality evolution. 81
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe AI content double standards« on: January 06, 2024, 06:15 »
+1 Yes, it's even scandalous. There is no longer any respect, no recognition, they wallow in greed. New generation values... 82
Adobe Stock / Re: Am I ok to use the US flag on an AI Generated stockphoto?« on: January 05, 2024, 12:08 »
Wanna learn basis for real photography instead of typing on a keyboard to get generated images?
84
Shutterstock.com / Re: You climbed to a higher level!« on: January 05, 2024, 10:33 »85
Adobe Stock / Re: Will there be an Adobe Stock 2023 contributor bonus program?« on: January 03, 2024, 14:57 »Does anybody (Mat?) know if there will be an Adobe Stock contributor bonus program for 2023? https://www.microstockgroup.com/fotolia-com/adobe-stock-2023-contributor-bonus-program/msg594995/#msg594995 Maybe another not coming "good news" from AS... 86
Adobe Stock / Re: 9 Million+ AI generated photos - Stock Photography coming to end« on: December 30, 2023, 18:30 »
Uploading a photo was throwing a drop in a pool. Now, throwing a drop in an ocean...
87
Adobe Stock / Re: 9 Million+ AI generated photos - Stock Photography coming to end« on: December 23, 2023, 15:49 »
30 Million+
88
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock: adult or discriminatory content allowed? how to mark a adult image?« on: December 23, 2023, 11:11 »Okay. Yes i read this part. You choose virtual AI models, sorry, but you discriminate real living models. You discriminate organic true reality by choosing AI fake and irreality... When someone is mature, he abstains when there is a risk, right? 89
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobestock Generative AI Submission Requirements Question« on: December 16, 2023, 05:38 »Just send however you like it and whatever you like. Yes, absolute contempt, and absolute business, with a big smile... Edit: Btw, nobody has got any right on these images, right? not the human prompter, nor Adobe Stock... Anybody can take/buy and resell 90
General Stock Discussion / Re: adobe massive batch rejections? (actual photos + gen ai)« on: December 15, 2023, 14:39 »mass rejects have been reported for some time now in previous threadsMass AI submissions also have been reported coincidence? 91
General Stock Discussion / Re: adobe massive batch rejections? (actual photos + gen ai)« on: December 15, 2023, 14:18 »So... Maybe they reject all your "regular photographies" because they get tons of AI generated that they judge better quality... Just think that your AI generated do the same for regular photographies from others... Be sure Adobe makes no difference for both. They are unable. Brave new world... 92
General Stock Discussion / Re: adobe massive batch rejections? (actual photos + gen ai)« on: December 15, 2023, 13:07 »So... OOhhhh... prompting for genAI is Time consuming... A pity... 93
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: CanStockPhoto ceased operations and is closing down« on: December 13, 2023, 14:59 »[...] Portion of old message from the forum here. 94
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: CanStockPhoto ceased operations and is closing down« on: December 13, 2023, 13:40 »
Just type : https://www.agefotostock.com/age/en/Search.aspx?author=CSP_$$$
after replacing "$$$" by the nick you had at Canstock. Maybe other partners... 95
Canva / Re: Almost any images get rejected instantly?!« on: December 11, 2023, 15:30 »
Only 4 approved out of 7 for my last batch. Seems to be that time when sites were accepting flood of low quality stuf is finished. Maybe not a so bad news. Now, they should clean the database too.
96
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time« on: December 10, 2023, 15:47 »So, your conclusion is to find ridiculous that Adobe don't review your pictures whereas they are doing well elsewhere... why not. personaly, I would not blame you.The introduction with ridiculous is of course always a good argument and a good start for a discussion at eye level.Adobe have serious issues which are preventing them from reviewing images in under a month and preventing them from not rejecting a whole batch at once, hopefully they sort their business methods out next yearIt's ridiculous. Adobe has no problem, they sell, and don't need validation of new images to make a profit. On the other hand, yes, some contributors have problems not having a growing portfolio, to represent something other than a micro drop in an ocean of images. 97
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time« on: December 10, 2023, 13:46 »Be sure that prompters flooding their AI will be very soon not favored...It's ridiculous. Adobe has no problem, they sell, and don't need validation of new images to make a profit. On the other hand, yes, some contributors have problems not having a growing portfolio, to represent something other than a micro drop in an ocean of images.How do I know if I'm favored or not? 98
Adobe Stock / Re: Review time« on: December 10, 2023, 11:02 »Adobe have serious issues which are preventing them from reviewing images in under a month and preventing them from not rejecting a whole batch at once, hopefully they sort their business methods out next yearIt's ridiculous. Adobe has no problem, they sell, and don't need validation of new images to make a profit. On the other hand, yes, some contributors have problems not having a growing portfolio, to represent something other than a micro drop in an ocean of images. But quality portfolios are still favored by algorithms, and that's good 99
CanStockPhoto.com / Re: CanStockPhoto ceased operations and is closing down« on: December 09, 2023, 07:50 »I also received my final payment. OH Noooooo! It was so funny to read you 100
Off Topic / Re: Film: The Wizard of AI« on: December 06, 2023, 15:17 »
The thumbnail shows a screen placed on a stand which is off-center, against all logic.
|
|