I'll stay.

  Lisa, you should add another option, Becoming exclusive to not have your photos in PP.  Sounds weird but it is an option...

Claude

If I remember you're from the Montreal region, have you tried Omer deSerre store in Montreal?

Claude

According to Rogermexico,
quote :
�New Royalty Structure

The new royalties will take effect his week. We posted the revised redeemed credit targets last friday�

So we will see the real effects of these cuts next week...

http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=288642&page=1

Claude

I gotta say something...FD has been in microstock for a good while. I personally don't think he stole anyone's ....  (...).   If I misunderstood this please explain.

No you did not misunderstand.  FD never said he agree on such a situation.  He said he has to deal with such situation.  Describing a situation has nothing to do with opinion.

And trying to ignore this kind of problems never solved them...

Back to the topic, I'm pretty sure that with some explanations betwen FD and SS-BS everything will be back to normal...

Claude

Quote from: holgs on September 26, 2010, 09:52

I wasn't suggesting that you were forgetting the higher prices, just that you couldn't use these stats to extrapolate your potential earnings as an exclusive.

The way the targets are set it would be relatively easier for exclusives to reach than independents precisely for the reason that they're accumulating credits faster on the same download numbers.  

I get what you are saying Holgs, and that makes sense.  

Also, my comment about not forgetting the difference was addressed more to Aeonf and LeCyclope - I should have quoted them:

Quote from: aeonf on September 26, 2010, 04:36

lisafx: a few more factors you forgot and where not mentioned here:

1. As an exc your files are much more expensive. more expensive photos = less demand = less downloads.

Quote from: le_cyclope on September 25, 2010, 21:10

I think you forgot that as an excusive, your photos are going to be sold at higher price, and this can go from 20 to 100% more.  So this means more redeemed credits par sale and more $.

It's really hard to know which way the exclusivity factor will cut as far as credits go.  I suspect it would be a huge advantage.  That's why the comparison chart numbers only being slightly more than double for exclusivity surprised me.  

One thing I know for sure - there's no way I could manage the 1.4 million to get 45% as a BD exclusive if folks at Sean's level aren't getting it.  Those guys run rings around me both talent and saleswise.  

Sorry Lisa, maybe the word �forget� was not the good one!  

What I meant was that I never red anywhere the fact that an exclusive receive more RC than an independant for each sale.  For me, it makes a huge difference, because on Jan 2011, my overall revenues as independant will low by +/- 5% or will raise 3 % if I choose to go exclusive.

I do not have a big portfolio and have only 2450 sales so far, but because of that (!) I still keep records of my sales by size.  So for those of you who might be interested, my numbers go like this:

XS   : 28.4%
S     : 24.6%
M    : 28.4%
L     : 18.3%
XL   : 0.34%

I think that these proportion of sales by size must be standard (maybe with the exception of XL and larger); I mean that they rely on what the buyers buy.

So based on these % and on the cost (in credits) of photos for independant VS exclusive, I estimate that my income will be 2.58 time what I do actually.

That's why I was asking if I was missing something, like a change in the price (in credit) of photo sold by indy vs exclusive...

Claude

At 50, i am in the 20+.

Are my math ok?

Claude

one thing which doesn't convince me is that the photographer is perfectly in the centre of video, hiding the main subject

why doesn't the camera guy try to move a bit and shoot the couple instead of the photographer's back?

He tried putting the video cam between the couple and the photographer but photos looked bad...
 

This is from their TOS Agreement:

D. You may request the removal of Content from the Site at any time, however, Content may persist in a
User�s shopping cart up to sixty (60) days, and if purchased by a User, will remain available for download
and sublicensing by such User for a sixty (60) day period. Further, Content may appear for a longer
period on affiliate and partner sites, however Veer will use reasonable efforts to cause Content to be
removed from the Sites of any affiliates and partners within sixty (60) days from the removal from the Site.
You acknowledge and agree that Veer, its affiliates and partners may continue to license the Content in
accordance with this Agreement until the Content is so removed. You also acknowledge that Content
which has been sub-licensed to a User prior to removal from the Site will remain available to the User in
accordance with the terms of the Customer Agreement

From this, to me it could be ok with iStock, I mean if on any site a costumer has one of your photo in his shopping cart, it is not like this photo is still on sale,isn't it?  And as long as you make effort (and prove it to iStock), maybe they could consider giving you the exclusive status?

I wonder because I am planning exclusivity and I am ready (except for this one!).  The only thing that slows me is the very low sales for me at IS since june...
Claude

� Get a little closer...3...2...1...Smile!�

                                           -   My dad

Interresting results.

Thanks!
Claude

Maybe I'm naive and certainly I'm OT but I'm wondering why people are still using external HD for backup, instead of a storage service like Amazon S3.    Is it just a lack of trust, even when the vendor is the size ofAmazon?  Yes I agree, even the big boys have their disasters, but it's hard to imagine Amazon, with all of its distributed redundancy, actually losing content.  I haven't heard of it happening.

I like to backup all my photos, in RAW, so it could easily go up to 1 Tbyte quite fast.  Uploading all those files to Amazon would take a lot of time and lots $$$ !

Claude

I presume TIA is "thanks in advance".

Oh I see...

You're welcome!

Claude