MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - MatHayward
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 76
176
« on: May 25, 2023, 18:21 »
Check your dashboard for info.
Thanks for calling this out, Sean!
Yes! The Free collection is back for photos and nominations are open. Please sign into the contributor portal and nominate any and/or all eligible photos as soon as possible.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Mat Hayward
What about vectors ?
It's only photos at this time. Vectors are not up for renewal yet. Thanks for the question. -Mat
177
« on: May 25, 2023, 18:21 »
To me, Adobe's touting their AI as "ethical" while using our work without our permission and without payment, while thousands of people take advantage of that data in Adobe firefly beta, and now in Photoshop beta too, is simply wrong.
I've been so impressed by Adobe's attempts to engage the Stock photography community from the Discord channel to the plethora of free classes, AdobeMAX online free, and Mat's engagement here. I love their products and use LR and PS pretty much every day - and lately I've been blown away by PS Express on my iPad too. I'm also up 47% from this time last year in my earnings on Adobe Stock.
So, I'd happily be an Adobe fan, but their claim that their AI is "ethical" just rings hollow when we are left with nothing after they used our hard work, not just the photos, but all the time, effort and research that goes into the keywords too, to train their awesome AI.
They could not have done it without us. It's time to give us our share.
Thanks everyone for your feedback. We know that most, if not all of you are eager to learn the details of the Adobe Stock compensation plan for Adobe Firefly training. As you are likely aware, even with the integration into Photoshop this week, Firefly is still in beta which means that any content produced with the software cannot be used for commercial purposes. I want to assure you that, as we previously stated with the original introduction to Firefly, we plan to compensate Adobe Stock artists for the use of their content in the dataset training. This is a top priority at Adobe. I’m not able to provide details yet, as they are being finalized, but as originally announced, we will share information about the compensation when Firefly exits beta. We appreciate your candid, yet respectful feedback. I can assure you that your comments are being seen. Respectfully yours, Mat Hayward
178
« on: May 25, 2023, 15:48 »
Mat, can you please conform that the "checkbox" on the left with the blue color means an image IS nominated and the one without the color means it is NOT nominted?

Because last year a lot of my images that I am absolutely sure I did not nominate ended up in the free collection, so this year I want to rule out any mistaked on my side.
As mentioned above, blue is nominated. Thanks for checking. -Mat
179
« on: May 25, 2023, 10:39 »
Check your dashboard for info.
Thanks for calling this out, Sean! Yes! The Free collection is back for photos and nominations are open. Please sign into the contributor portal and nominate any and/or all eligible photos as soon as possible. Let me know if you have any questions, Mat Hayward
180
« on: May 24, 2023, 09:56 »
Finally Adobe introduced its brand new Generative Fill technology with Photoshop Beta. Everything is can be done easier now but what are the usage circumstances of this feature? Can a photographer use it on photos and sell on any agency? As far as i know, Shutterstock only works with Dall-E and Adobe has it own Firefly technology.
Thanks for the question. While Firefly is in beta, it cannot be used for commercial purposes. Therefor, Firefly content cannot be sold in stock at this time. -Mat Hayward
181
« on: May 17, 2023, 10:32 »
Something started to work, but now I'm stuck on "This code has already been redeemed" when I try to redeem the code on https://redeem.adobe.com/
Obviously I didn't redeem it before 
We are looking into this. I'll provide an update asap.
Thank you,
Mat
The issue described above has been resolved. If you are still having trouble redeeming your code, please reach out via the contact us link found at the bottom of the Adobe Stock Contributor Portal. thank you, Mat Hayward
182
« on: May 15, 2023, 16:08 »
I remember Mr. Hayward promising this years ago, now he's gone silent.
How about an update on this feature, adobe can't be struggling for money and it's long overdue.
Setting a custom thumbnail is still not an option.
Thanks for your feedback,
Mat Hayward
I remember Mr. Hayward promising this years ago, now he's gone silent.
How about an update on this feature, adobe can't be struggling for money and it's long overdue.
Setting a custom thumbnail is still not an option.
Thanks for your feedback,
Mat Hayward
Why not? Why is Adobe having difficulty to implement this? Don't they see the value of it, is it to costly or does Adobe think it isn't of any value for us contributors? We need practical answers, be more eloborate then just saying it's still not an option. It's informative (but we already know it is still not an option). But it is not an answer to the question asked. More and more doubting the value of your reactions on this forum and why Adobe can't call things as they are from their point of view. Maybe we will listen if we agree or not.
I don't know why not, SVH. It's a known need, but has not been added to the list for engineering resources. thanks, Mat
183
« on: May 15, 2023, 14:13 »
I remember Mr. Hayward promising this years ago, now he's gone silent.
How about an update on this feature, adobe can't be struggling for money and it's long overdue.
Setting a custom thumbnail is still not an option. Thanks for your feedback, Mat Hayward
184
« on: May 13, 2023, 01:33 »
Thanks Michael, I appreciate your courtesy very much. To clarify, yes, there is a large volume of generative AI content coming in which has created a backlog in the moderation queue. As mentioned, we have recently set upload limits to give the moderation team a chance to catch up in the queue. We are looking at up to 5 weeks in some cases for review times. I'm hopeful we will get that wait time down to a more reasonable level in the weeks to come.
Thanks to most of you for your patience,
Mat Hayward
Hi Mat, thanks for the info but is there a reason, that you would give here, why some contributors images are not reviewed for a month while other contributors that submitted more recently are getting reviewed? I can accept waiting patiently except for the fact that it doesn't seem to be fairly spread out based on upload dates. I have less than 100 in the queue, the person I know with many reviews over the last month is usually at or under 100 in review at a time. I am speaking of AI mostly, though I do have one photo that is also waiting longer than typical. Neither of us are new adobe contributors.
Thanks, Impatient for review justice 
No, sorry but I don't have specific details on moderation queues and how they are set up to share. thanks for the question, Mat
185
« on: May 12, 2023, 13:38 »
To clarify, the date range you see in your pending files is based on the date you uploaded the image to the Adobe Stock contributor portal, not the date you actually submit the file for review. If you uploaded a file and wait for a while before submitting, the time pending you see will be longer than the actual time it has been in the queue.
That said, I acknowledge the wait time is still significant but progress is being made. We appreciate your patience.
-Mat Hayward
Thank you very much for the constant information! It's good to know that things are progressing :-)
Have a nice day, Michael
Why these compliments? You look like a groupie. And is his real name Michael? I thought it was just Mat.
You could give complements to Mat if he would explain why this delay is happening. Most likely due to a massive inflow of AI images but that is not what he is sharing. He is leaving you in the dark, as usual, but you think it's great that he informs you. Djeez.
Hello SVH,
I think it's simply good that someone from a stock agency talks to us at all and keeps us up to date - it's perfectly acceptable to be polite and say thank you, even if this concept is apparently alien to you :-)
And my name is Michael (not his name), as it is usually added at the end of a note/email/etc. ;-)
And if you don't like me being polite, then please do us both a favour and keep your opinion to yourself!
Have a nice day, Michael
Thanks Michael, I appreciate your courtesy very much. To clarify, yes, there is a large volume of generative AI content coming in which has created a backlog in the moderation queue. As mentioned, we have recently set upload limits to give the moderation team a chance to catch up in the queue. We are looking at up to 5 weeks in some cases for review times. I'm hopeful we will get that wait time down to a more reasonable level in the weeks to come. Thanks to most of you  for your patience, Mat Hayward
186
« on: May 12, 2023, 11:38 »
Something started to work, but now I'm stuck on "This code has already been redeemed" when I try to redeem the code on https://redeem.adobe.com/
Obviously I didn't redeem it before 
We are looking into this. I'll provide an update asap. Thank you, Mat
187
« on: May 10, 2023, 15:47 »
I’m over 30 days now. The status went from saying how many days ago I submitted my content to saying “Submitted last month”.
To clarify, the date range you see in your pending files is based on the date you uploaded the image to the Adobe Stock contributor portal, not the date you actually submit the file for review. If you uploaded a file and wait for a while before submitting, the time pending you see will be longer than the actual time it has been in the queue. That said, I acknowledge the wait time is still significant but progress is being made. We appreciate your patience. -Mat Hayward
188
« on: May 03, 2023, 13:38 »
Taking up to 10 days to review content seems reasonable, but I have some content in the queue for closer to 30 days now. So I eventually contacted contributor support. Then I received the standard reply about a high volume of uploads and review times being longer than usual.
I also recently submitted content to another large site and it was reviewed in less than 24 hours.
It is taking on average between 25-30 days for illustrations to be reviewed currently. We are working to get this down to a more reasonable length of time. To do so, we've recently implimented an upload limit for new contributor accounts. This should allow the moderation team to clear the backlog which is currently running deep. Once that is cleared, we'll start to adjust the upload limit up or down based on the volume of submitted assets at any given time. The goal is for timely reviews for everyone and I am confident we'll get back there in time. Thanks very much for your patience. -Mat Hayward
189
« on: April 29, 2023, 23:31 »
Thanks for the updates and emails. We are looking into this and I'll provide an update when I have some information to provide.
Hello Mat,
Do you have any updates? I cannot use Adobe Photoshop any more without a license.
No updates to share yet, I'll be sure to post here when there is news. Thank you, Mat Hayward
190
« on: April 26, 2023, 17:04 »
Hi Everyone, A quick update to let you know that as promised, we have added a search filter for generative AI images for Adobe Stock customers.This can be discovered in the filter panel on the left of the search results. It is very important if you are submitting images created with generative AI software, that you click the check box when indexing to confirm it is generative AI. All other generative AI submission guidelines remain in place, including metadata requirements and submitting all generative AI images as illustrations regardless of whether they are photo-realistic or not. https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.htmlthank you, Mat Hayward
191
« on: April 17, 2023, 11:03 »
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the updates and emails. We are looking into this and I'll provide an update when I have some information to provide.
-Mat Hayward
192
« on: April 11, 2023, 12:32 »
HI! Question about AI-generated images with people. Do I understand correctly that we can skip par of "Witness" in the Property/Model release if it is AI generated image, as there is no real person under 18, for whom witness would be actual? Please share your experience, how do you submit images with persons to Adobe. I don't have any person just to use as a signature giver as I see in lots of youtube videos as suggested.
A property release is required for images that feature fictional people created with generative AI software. A witness is not required on that release. More details on generative AI submission guidelines can be found here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.htmlThanks, Mat Hayward
193
« on: March 22, 2023, 14:35 »
To clarify, Kirsten is referencing the question from people who may not have received the actual email yesterday. As she stated, you must be opted in to receive marketing emails via adobe.com to receive this sort of information in real time. You can be assured that any major announcements like the news about Firefly will be called out here in Microstock Group Forum too.  Thank you, Mat Hayward
194
« on: March 21, 2023, 15:29 »
Mat, what if I use AI to transform my original image?
Will it be considered as AI or original image?
I'm assuming you mean this in the context of uploading to Adobe Stock? If you are using any generative AI software during any part of the creation of your asset, you must comply with all generative AI submissions. As noted above in this thread, while Firefly is in beta, you cannot use the content generated for commercial use, which includes stock uploads. As a reminder, the generative AI submission guidelines can be found here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.htmlThanks, Mat Hayward
195
« on: March 21, 2023, 13:51 »
Adobe Firefly, I did not understand anything. Will I be able to create images in Adobe Firefly in the future and then sell on Adobe?
During the Firefly beta, any Firefly-generated assets cannot be used for commercial purposes. We will share details about the use of Firefly-generated assets once Firefly is officially released. Adobe Stock today accepts AI generated works that otherwise meet Adobe Stock’s requirements. Thanks for the question, Mat Hayward
196
« on: March 21, 2023, 08:05 »
Hi Everyone, This morning Pacific Daylight Time, we emailed our contributors the following message. “We wanted you to be the first to know that today Adobe introduced Adobe Firefly, a new family of creative generative AI models. Firefly’s initial focus on images and test effects is now available in beta at firefly.adobe.com. The first model of Firefly is trained on Adobe Stock images, openly licensed content, and public domain content, where copyright has expired and is designed to generate images safe for commercial use. During the beta phase, the Firefly-generated assets cannot be used for commercial purposes. We are investing in generative AI to help creators transform the way they imagine and explore possibilities. We are committed to developing generative AI responsibly, with creators at the center. Through efforts like the Content Authenticity Initiative, we’re standing up for accountability, responsibility, and transparency in generative AI. We are developing a compensation model for Stock contributors, and we will share the details of this model when Firefly exits beta.” You can read more about our announcement here: https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2023/03/21/bringing-gen-ai-to-creative-cloud-adobe-firefly Please see our FAQ for more information about the beta release of Firefly here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/firefly-faq-for-adobe-stock-contributors.html Learn more about the Content Authenticity Initiative here: https://contentauthenticity.org/ Please let me know if you have any questions, Mat Hayward
197
« on: March 10, 2023, 11:15 »
Same thing happened to me today, it was video. Custom "sale", earning blank.
Can Mat explain it?
We have identified the issue and are currently in the process of addressing it. Thank you, Mat Hayward
198
« on: March 02, 2023, 12:13 »
A quick note to confirm the last few questions...
Due to the current conversion to USD, a withdrawal is temporarily not possible. As of Friday, March 3, the payout will be possible again.
Future payouts will be processed in US Dollars.
Thank you,
Mat Hayward
199
« on: February 28, 2023, 20:55 »
The last two days I have sales on Adobe Stock but the THUMB-NAILS and earnings of the photos are not showing up on the earning page. I got an e-mail today telling me I had sales but NO thumbails with the earning. Anyone else having this problem? Thanks
You are likely experiencing a browser issue, Oscar. Try clearing your browser cache or use a different browser entirely. The other possibility is that you inadvertently created an alternate account and are signed into that one instead. -Mat Hayward
200
« on: February 21, 2023, 14:47 »
As long as the subscription you are redeeming for is the exact same as your current plan, the expiration date should extend out an additional year if redeemed now.
And mine did - thank you Adobe - but it took a little while after I redeemed the code for the expiration date to change from 2023 to 2024. I logged out and in again, refreshed the page - but I don't think it was anything I did, just needed a little more patience 
I think that is a normal experience. Thanks for sharing Jo Ann. After redeeming, give it around 5 minutes or so before you can expect to see the expiration date for your subscription to update. -Mat
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 76
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|